INDEX

Topics are arranged alphabetically in the INDEX.
Showing posts with label Renaissance. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Renaissance. Show all posts

Friday, May 17, 2024

Ethics in the Renaissance


Dr. Alice C. Linsley

Timeline

Giotto’s great works 1266–1337 AD
Pico della Mirandola 1463–1494 AD
Niccoló Machiavelli 1469–1527 AD
Michelangelo 1475–1564 AD
Columbus’ first voyage 1492–1493 AD
Emperor Charles V 1500–1558 AD
John Calvin 1509–1564 AD
Jesuit Order founded 1540 AD
Period of Religious Wars 1560–1598 AD
Christopher Marlowe 1564–1593 AD
Spanish Armada defeated 1588 AD


"It must be grasped that the Renaissance was primarily a human event, propelled forward by a number of individuals of outstanding talent, which in some cases amounted to genius. ...The Renaissance was about the work of individuals, and in a sense it was about individualism."--Paul Johnson

"I am aware that a philosopher’s ideas are not subject to the judgment of ordinary persons, because it is his endeavor to seek the truth in all things, to the extent permitted to human reason by God."--Nicolaus Copernicus (1473–1543)

    
The Renaissance was a cultural movement beginning in the 14th century in Italy. It spread to the rest of Europe, reaching England by the 16th century and northern Europe by the mid-17th century. The predominant social, intellectual and literary currents of the period emphasized appreciation of beauty, interest in classical pagan art and architecture, and the value of individual expression.




The Renaissance was driven by talented individuals who were ever seeking greater achievements. It involved renewed interest in pagan and Christian themes in literature and art. The two traditions often were shown in the same painting and depicted as sharing similar values or contrasting values. Titian’s portrayal of Sacred and Profane Love is an example (shown above). It shows two women: one dressed and holding a branch of myrtle, and the other naked and holding an oil lamp. Between them, Cupid stirs the waters. An obelisk and a church are seen in the town in the background. Hunters and hunting dogs are seen in the field behind the women. Two bodies of water separate the town from the field.

The artist who marks the transition to Renaissance painting is Giotto di Bondone, described by the 16th century biographer Vasari, as initiating “the great art of painting as we know it today, introducing the technique of drawing accurately from life, which had been neglected for more than two hundred years.”

Many of Giotto’s works were painted on wood panels in the style of icons. These were commissioned for use in the great churches of Italy. A Giotto triptych was found as recently at 2012. (See this video.)

Imagine living as an artist in Italy during the early 16th century (High Renaissance). How would you distinguish yourself from the other artists living in your area: Michelangelo, Raphael, Leonardo, or Titian? The competition was steep!

The artists of the Renaissance excelled in many medium. In the early Renaissance paintings were done on wood panels using tempura paint, an egg-based paint. From about 1550, paintings were done on canvas with oil paint. Some of the greatest Renaissance artists did fresco painting on walls and ceilings. Many also excelled at sculpture. Michelangelo Buonarroti is an example. Michelangelo completed most of his famous sculptures by age 30, but he continued to work until age 88.

Leonardo da Vinci (1452-1519) excelled at drawing and his drawings reveal his genius and remarkable imagination. His private sketch books contain drawings of helicopters, gliders, a machine gun (“3-barrelled organ”), an armored tank, and many machines. Some of the machines he drew have been built and found to work very well. Da Vinci also researched the human body to ensure his artworks were anatomically accurate. Between 1507 and 1513 he dissected more than 30 human corpses. Today Da Vinci’s drawings of the human body are regarded as masterpieces both as works of art and as studies of the human anatomy.

There was as much competition and individual drive in literature and drama as in art. Christopher Marlowe’s work embodied the Humanism of Erasmus. Erasmus lived in England between 1505 and 1517 and he was influential in fostering sympathy for Henry VIII’s political aspirations. Erasmus’ views aligned well with Henry’s desire to centralize political and religious power in the person of the King and to require obedience to a unified church and state in England. Marlowe questioned religious authority, much as Erasmus questioned the corruption he saw among Roman Catholic prelates during his time in Rome. Marlowe’s plays were as famous in his day as those of Shakespeare, one of his contemporaries.

William Shakespeare and Christopher Marlowe were trained in classical literature and were writing for the stage between 1587 and 1593. Marlowe died in 1593. Prior to 1587, there were no educated men dedicated to the public theater as professional writers. However, in England by the time Marlowe and Shakespeare had gained public recognition, there were eight other men competing for work as dramatists, and their ambition drove them to ever greater individual accomplishments.


A Time Like Our Own

In many ways the Renaissance was a time like our own. It was marked by individualism, renewed interest in paganism, religious conflict, Islamic expansion, deadly diseases, and new directions in literature, art, healthcare and education. The accomplishments of the Renaissance must be viewed against the backdrop of bloody religious conflict, the plague, the territorial ambitions of the Ottoman Turks in the Mediterranean, and the discovery of the New World which expanded geographical horizons and stimulated European imaginations and economies. The Renaissance was a period marked by the quest for discovery in virtually every area of human endeavor.

The invention of the printing press made it possible for scholars to share their research and for literate nobles and merchants to enjoy the great literature of their day. The impact was much like the impact of the internet today. The difference is that many people during the Renaissance were not able to read. It was not an egalitarian society in which equality was a value, and it was not a democratic society. Enacting laws and enforcing laws was the work of the landed nobles and their king.

In our time we face religious upheaval and renewed interest in pagan ideas and religions. We live with terrible diseases such as COVID, Ebola and HIV/AIDS, and the resurgence of resistant strains of old diseases such a Tuberculosis and Polio. Healthcare reform is a topic of concern to many. In education, parents seek alternatives to public education, such as charter schools, parochial schools, home schooling, and classical education schools.

Islamic leaders call for expansion of Islam, aspiring to establish an Islamic world empire under Sharia Law. This has led to the outlawing of Sharia in some places. Some extremists propose holy war (jihad) against any who oppose them.

As there are no new lands to discover, we look instead to the heavens, as did Galileo. We have technologies that DaVinci would have loved and probably imagined: Space X, Starlink, space satellites, etc. It is hoped that cooperative space exploration will lead to the discovery of earth-like planets in other galaxies. This hope stirs the human imagination and nurtures technological development.


Ethical Considerations of the Renaissance

This lesson concentrates on the 15th and 16th centuries because it was during these centuries that the key ethical questions of the Renaissance came most clearly into focus. The ethical questions of the Renaissance that will be addressed in this lesson are:

  • The dignity of Man
  • Responsibility of the nobility
  • Reform of education and healthcare
  • The power of rulers and the authority of the Papacy
  • Religious intolerance, persecution and war
  • Individual conscience and personal interpretation

The question of human nature was addressed by both Roman Catholicism and Lutheranism. The Catholic position held that while humans are sinful due to the fall of Man, the image of God with which we were originally created is not fully erased. Therefore Man has dignity derived from being made in the “image and likeness of God.” The Reformers Martin Luther and John Calvin did not deny that humans were created in God’s image, but they believed that that the fall so thoroughly corrupted us that we were robbed of our original dignity. Our sinfulness is such that we no longer are free to desire communion with God. Our wills are in bondage to sin and we stand before the Creator as filthy beggars.

During the Renaissance, Luther’s view was challenged by the Christian Humanist Erasmus and by others who believed that the Lutheran doctrine of total depravity robs humanity of the dignity that remains even after the Fall. That dignity comes from the image of God that cannot be completely erased from human nature.

Humanism took various expressions in the Renaissance. Some humanists, such as Erasmus, were deeply religious. These stressed the dignity of man and both heavenly and earthly rewards. Others were scoffers of religion who sought all possible rewards in this life. This secular humanism was a reaction against Church authority and also against the bloodshed that resulted from religious conflict.

Renaissance Humanism shifted the focus from God to Man and from the supernatural to the natural. Human achievement and creative potential took center stage. Some Renaissance thinkers believed that humans have the potential to become almost divine through the use of reason (Pico della Mirandola). Others believed that humans could achieve dignity only by casting off the social and religious conventions of their time (Christopher Marlowe). The development of the printing press made it possible for all to share their ideas with a wider audience than had ever been imagined.

The debate over the dignity of man was fed by both scientific discovery and humanistic literature. Copernicus proved that the sun was at the center of the planetary system, rather than earth, radically altering the worldview of many learned people. This was significant because earth and humanity could no longer be regarded as the center of the universe.

The Italian philosopher Giovanni Pico della Mirandola, in a work titled “Oration on the Dignity of Man” exalted humanity as being capable of rising to the level of angels through philosophy and reason. He pictured humans between beasts and angels and insisted that by allowing reason to rule our emotions, we ascend to the level of angels. By acting against reason, we descend to the level of beasts. He asserted that only human beings could change themselves since humans alone have free will. His Oration on the Dignity of Man is considered the Manifesto of the Renaissance.

Christopher Marlowe’s play Doctor Faustus typifies the spirit of humanism in the character of Faustus who aspires to superhuman powers by making a pact with the devil. Faustus is fascinated by the prospect of pushing beyond the religious conventions of his time. At the same time, he fears the possible consequences. The character Faustus embodies both the boldness and the anxiety of Renaissance individualism.

Faustus represents Marlowe’s exploration of his own psyche. He scoffed at the major religions and said, “I count religion but a childish toy.” He also mocked the intelligence of religious people. The character of Faustus makes a declaration about the dignity of man that is very Nietzschean, that is to say: a man can achieve any earthly power he might desire, but to do so, he must utterly reject social and religious conventions.

Doctor Faustus was performed twenty-five times between October 1594 and October 1597 and was one of the most popular plays of Renaissance England. The troupe that performed Marlowe’s play was called The Admiral’s Men because they were supported financially by their patron Charles Howard, 1st Earl of Nottingham, who commanded a squadron of ships.

Patronage of the arts developed in the Middle Ages but reached its peak during the Renaissance. Nobles vied with the Church for the services of the best artists, poets and philosophers. Wealthy families provided housing, food and a stipend in exchange for an artist’s work. Renaissance patronage made it possible for people like Giotto, Titan, and Michelangelo to dedicate themselves to their work, but it was not without problems, as we will discover when we explore the ethics of patronage.


The Responsibility of Kings and Nobles

During the Renaissance the ideal nobleman was a literate and refined gentleman of courtly manners. He had responsibility for the care of servants, peasants and family members, which for noblemen of limited resources posed a financial challenge. Some noble families lost their estates or became vassals of more wealthy lords in order to be able to keep their estates. This meant swearing loyalty to the overlord and coming to his aid in time of war.

Many nobles sought to be patrons of great artists in order to gain social status. During the Middle Ages the Church had been the primary patron of the arts, but during the Renaissance new systems of patronage developed. Artists were supported by individuals, noble families, organizations, and cities. The patron who commissioned work from an artist was to provide his material needs until that work was finished. The Florentine wool guild, for example, commissioned religious paintings and sculptures for the adornment of the Cathedral in Florence.

The Renaissance saw greater centralization of power among wealthy rulers, sometimes called “new monarchs.” These were men who were able to command armies to police their territories and to expand their territories. After a period of famine, plague and self-serving medieval chivalry, the new monarchs stirred Europe out of decline by forming new allegiances. Renaissance diplomacy became an art form and there was much political intrigue. Powerful new weapons were employed in war. Power struggles and shifting alliances between kings resulted in the destruction of property and citizens. This was evident on Italian soil where the German Hapsburg kings and the French Valois kings engaged in prolonged wars that devastated Italy.

Religion played a role in government. Kings often sought the support of bishops to justify their political actions. Henry VIII declared that the Pope no longer had authority in the realm of England. In Geneva, Calvin’s teachings ruled the day and his Consistory controlled all aspects of civil and religious life.

The Consistory was a council of pastors and elders elected to represent the 13 districts (cantons). The Consistory maintained church discipline, dictated standards of moral behavior, and established laws. Calvin has been accused of using the Consistory to advance his political aims and to punish those who challenged his authority. Some of his opponents were tortured and beheaded, and those accused of witchcraft were hunted and burned to death. In 1545, the Consistory charged 23 people with practicing witchcraft and they were burned at the stake in Geneva. Calvin's acceptance of torture was not unusual among rulers of that time.


Machiavellian Ethics

By far the most significant political philosopher of the Renaissance was Niccólo Machiavelli whose writings on statesmanship have brought him both notoriety and fame.

Machiavelli took a pragmatic approach to government. He believed that the first responsibility of the ruler is to increase and maintain his power and that the ruler was justified to use any means to accomplish this. Machiavelli studied the political tactics of some of Italy’s most cunning rulers, particularly those of Cesare Borgia, who through military prowess was enlarging his holdings in central Italy. (Borgia was the illegitimate son of Pope Alexander VI.)

Machiavelli believed that bold and intelligent initiative on the part of a ruler could shape his fortune. In his view, human dignity was gained by exercise of the will to rule. Machiavelli provides instructions to the “new prince” on how to stabilize his power and retain control of his realm in his book “The Prince.” The prince is to appear benevolent in public while secretly acting as ruthlessly as necessary to squash his political opponents. He argues that this will achieve the greater good by maintaining social stability.

Machiavelli established guidelines for the ruler’s actions. He proposed this definition of acceptable cruelty: Whatever is done to one’s enemy must be swift, effective and short-lived, and there must not be collateral damage. In other words, killing a political opponent should be done as painlessly as possible, secretly, and without affecting other people or their property. Machiavelli justified this by reasoning that the ruler who has power can use it to benefit his subjects. The more powerful the ruler is, the greater his subjects’ benefits.

Machiavelli considered that some places, such as Milan, would never be ruled properly because there were too many nobles competing for power. His solution was to exterminate them all. He wrote, “In order to create a Republic in Milan it would be necessary to exterminate all the nobility. . . . For there are, among the nobles, so many exalted personages that the laws do not suffice to repress them, and they must needs be kept under by a living voice and a royal power.” (Discourse on the reform of the State of Firenze).

Machiavelli’s political ethics depart from those of Socrates, Plato and Aristotle. This is because Machiavelli saw that whatever a ruler does there are likely to be both good and bad consequences. In “The Discourses” (1517), he wrote, “It seems that in all the actions of men, besides the general difficulties of carrying them to a successful issue, the good is accompanied by some special evil, and so closely allied to it that it would seem impossible to achieve the one without encountering the other.”

Socrates would have argued that unless an action serves the common good of all citizens, the ruler should not do it. Plato would have said that a ruler who does evil is someone who does not have an intimate acquaintance with eternal Goodness. Aristotle argued that there are some actions which are always bad and should never be done.

Consider the different viewpoints expressed in the writings of Machiavelli and Aristotle:

Machiavelli wrote that it is not necessary for a prince to have the qualities of honestly, kindness, loyalty, etc, “but it is necessary to seem to have them…useful it is to seem compassionate, trustworthy, humane, endowed with integrity, religious, and to be such, but to be in such a condition, with one’s spirit so constructed, that, when you need to not possess these qualities, you are prepared and know how to shift to the contrary qualities… Let, then, a prince act in such a manner as to conquer and maintain his estate, and the means will always be judged honorable, and they will be praised by everyone – since the crowd is always going to be taken in by appearances and results, and in the world there is no one but the crowd…”

Aristotle wrote: “There are some actions and emotions whose very names connote baseness, e.g., spite, shamelessness, envy; and among actions, adultery, theft, and murder. These and similar emotions and actions imply by their very names that they are bad... It is, therefore, impossible ever to do right in performing them: to perform them is always wrong.”


Reform of Education and Healthcare

Around the time that Machiavelli was gaining recognition in Italy, Ignatius of Loyola was born in Spain (1491). He was to have a worldwide influence as the founder of the Jesuits, a Catholic religious order that quickly spread over the globe.

The first Jesuits were ordained to the priesthood in Venice and offered themselves in service to Pope Paul III, who gave official approval to the Order in 1540. Ignatius served as General Superior of the Jesuits until his death at the age of 65. During his lifetime Jesuit missionaries went to China, Africa, Mexico and South America. Jesuit priests founded several towns in Brazil, including São Paulo and Rio de Janeiro.

The Society of Jesus dedicated itself to education. The first Jesuit schools adopted the curriculum of the Renaissance humanist academies which included the study of Greek, Latin poetry, oratory, drama, mathematics, theology and history. When Ignatius' died in 1556, the Jesuits were operating 74 colleges on three continents, and by 1626 the order had established 400 colleges throughout Europe. Jesuits colleges and universities became the standard for excellence and produced some of the greatest minds of European history, among them: Copernicus, Galileo, Miguel de Cervantes, Otto Brufels (the “father” of botany), and the brilliant mathematician and philosopher René Descartes, to name a few.

The Catholic Church funded schools and charity work to the poor through its parishes and religious orders throughout Europe. Priests, nuns and lay clerics staffed schools and hospitals, but where Protestantism became the established religion, such as in northern Germany, Catholic educational and charitable efforts were taken over by Protestants.

Most of the hospitals in Europe were founded by Catholic orders of nuns and monks. The Ospedale Maggiore in Milan housed one of the first community hospitals, the largest such undertaking of the 15th century. In the 14th century, the Alexian Brothers in Germany and the Netherlands organized care for victims of the Black Plague and established institutions for people with contagious diseases such as leprosy. Nuns and monks provided most of the nursing care and even made important discoveries in the field.

During the Renaissance, universities in Italy, Spain and Germany became centers for the education of medical practitioners. Success in the cure of diseases encouraged further investigation of medicinal herbs, and autopsies of the dead helped doctors learn more about the human body.


Religious Intolerance

The Renaissance was a time of religious intolerance and bloody religious conflict. Catholic and Protestant rulers made war against each other. Catholics and Protestants killed each other and both fought the Ottoman Turks.

Under Luther’s influence northern German became Lutheran and the Catholics living there faced religious persecution. To escape trouble, many moved to southern Germany which remained Catholic. The 1555 Peace of Augsburg was a treaty between the catholic Emperor Ferdinand and the Lutheran princes. It was intended to lessen religious strife in Europe, but it actually made matters worse. The Peace of Augsburg caused thousands of Calvinists to flee from Germany to the Spanish Netherlands where they stirred resistance to Spain’s control of the Netherlands. The king of Spain was determined to squash the Calvinist resistance to his authority in the Netherlands and there were many years of bloody battles. Other Calvinists left Germany for France where they encountered intolerance from the mainly Catholic population. Still others went to Geneva or to England where they were more welcome.

When Charles V gave up his throne, his son, Philip II, inherited Spain, the Netherlands, most of Italy, and Spain's colonies in the New World. Philip’s troops viciously attacked Protestant protesters in Holland and Belgium. Determined to uproot Protestantism from the Netherlands, Philip brought in Inquisitors and increased the number of Catholic bishops from four to sixteen. The Protestant rebellion against Spain dragged on until 1648 and become part of the wider European conflict known as the “Thirty Years War.”

In 1566, the Duke of Alva with an army of 10,000 Spanish troops burned Calvinist churches, executed their leaders, and nearly extinguished the Calvinist resistance in the Netherlands. However, Calvinist sea raiders gained control of some ports in the north. When word spread of these Calvinist safe ports, more Calvinists flocked Holland. As a result of this migration, most people living in northern Holland today are Protestant.

Tensions between Calvinists and Catholics in France triggered anarchy and weakened the government. The Catholic majority opposed an influential minority of French Calvinists known as “Huguenots.” The Huguenots had the advantage of living primarily in the fortified southern cities ruled by nobles who provided excellent leadership. Catholic and Huguenot armies battled in France for almost 30 years, destroying fields, homes and lives. Seven religious wars were fought in France and the fighting often involved the massacre of women and children. From 1562-157l there were 5 massacres of Catholics and 18 massacres of Protestants, the most notorious being the Saint Bartholomew's Day Massacre (1572), when armed Catholics in Paris fell upon local and visiting Calvinists, killing 3000.

Spain used the unrest in France to intervene in France’s internal affairs. Tensions between Protestant England and Catholic Spain led the English to raid Spanish shipping and support the revolt in the Spanish Netherlands. Meanwhile Philip II conspired to dethrone Elizabeth I. The eclipse of Spain’s military and naval power came in 1588 when the English defeated the Spanish Armada.


Conscience and Individual Interpretation

The idea that one should act according to the dictates of one’s conscience emerged among the ancient Greeks. The conscience as a moral guide was one of the teachings at a famous philosophical academy in Tarsus in Turkey. This was the hometown of the Apostle Paul. The Tarsus academy was founded by the Stoic philosopher Athenodorus before Paul was born. The Greek geographer Strabo considered the Tarsus academy to be better than the academies of Athens and Alexandria, Egypt. Athenodorus taught that, “Every man's conscience is his god.” It is likely that Paul heard a great deal about the conscience while growing up in Tarsus because Paul makes abundant use of the Greek word for conscience in his New Testament writings (Romans 2:15; 1 Corinthians 8:7-12; 1 Timothy 1:5-19; Romans 9:1).

In the Renaissance, the individual conscience again emerged as a moral guide, but many thinkers hesitated to speak from their consciences for fear of persecution or charges of heresy. Such was the case with Galileo who had a strong interest in Copernican theory. In 1543, Copernicus published “Revolutions of the Celestial Orbs” in which he set forth his idea that the Sun was at the center of the universe and that the rotating Earth complete one full orbit around the Sun every 365 days. After much study, Galileo concluded that Copernicus was right. He admitted this in a 1597 letter to Johannes Kepler, who had also written about planetary systems. Galileo wrote, “Like you, I accepted the Copernican position several years ago and discovered from thence the cause of many natural effects which are doubtless inexplicable by the current theories.”

Galileo’s conscience led him to pursue the truth, but he was wise enough to keep his thoughts to himself until he had conclusively confirmed Copernicus’ calculations using a telescope. Galileo explained to Kepler: “I have not dared until now to bring my reasons and refutations into the open, being warned by the fortunes of Copernicus himself, our master, who procured for himself immortal fame among a few but stepped down among the great crowd.”

The Protestant movement broke with Church Tradition when it came to interpretation of the Bible. Among Catholics, Bible interpretation was done by Bible scholars; people who could read the texts in the original Hebrew, Aramaic and Greek. Protestants developed a different approach to Bible interpretation based on conscience and personal interpretation of the Bible, apart from the Tradition of the Church and the Church Fathers. The printing of Bibles in languages other than Latin made it possible for people to read the Bible in their own languages.

Historically, the Catholic Church valued individual conscience as a God-given gift that could lead the individual to virtue. However, challenges to the Catholic Church’s authority made the matter of individual conscience less important than unquestioning obedience to the Church’s teachings.

As Protestants rejected the Vatican’s teaching authority, they asserted for themselves new authorities: the individual conscience, personal interpretation of the Bible, and the importance of reason.

Baron Samuel Pufendorf, a German rationalist, concluded that the individual reason is capable of deciding between right and wrong, and between truth and falsehood. The Protestant movement leaned heavily on this rationalist idea. Coupled with Renaissance humanism and rationalism, Protestant thought prepared the way for modern ethics based on human reason, individual conscience, and personal experience.


Summary

During the Renaissance, rulers provided for artists and musicians who offered their services to their wealthy patrons. The more artists one could support, the more social status one had. The system of patronage expanded to include noble families, organizations and cities. The competition between artists to draw the attention of patrons drove them to ever greater personal accomplishments.

Many of the famous artists of the Renaissance were gifted in drawing, painting and sculpture. Some, like Leonardo da Vinci, were also visionaries who drew images of future inventions. Some excelled in math and the sciences, as well as in art. This multi-talented figure stands behind the phrase “a Renaissance man.”

During the Renaissance, there was a renewed interest in pagan themes in literature and art. Pagans themes were often portrayed alongside Christian themes. Often the two traditions were depicted as sharing similar values or contrasting values. Titan’s portrayal of Sacred and Profane Love is an example.

Competition was steep in literature and drama also. In the Golden Age of English drama there were ten famous playwrights competing for patrons.

Kings, bishops and nobles provided for artists and also took responsibility for family, servants and serfs who lived on their lands. They maintained armies and conducted diplomatic missions. They also defended the faith of their regions; Catholicism in Spain and Spanish holdings; Lutheranism in Northern Germany, and Calvinism in Switzerland.

Machiavelli believed that the ruler was to appear to be just and generous while dealing ruthlessly with his political opponents in secret. He justified his political ethics by reasoning that the ruler uses his power to benefit his subjects. The more powerful the ruler is, the greater his subjects’ benefits.

The humanism of the Renaissance stressed the dignity of man and the possibility of earthly rewards through individual accomplishments. Some humanists expressed the dignity of man in religious terms, stressing the image of God as an indelible mark. Pico della Mirandola believed that human dignity came with reason whereby humans can rise to the level of angels.

The Jesuits established universities throughout Europe and Catholic orders of nuns and monks founded many hospitals. Nuns and monks provided the nursing care and made important discoveries in the field of health care. Universities in Italy, Spain and Germany trained medical practitioners. Dissections were used to teach human anatomy.

Protestantism greatly influenced ethics during the Renaissance. Protestants developed ethical methods based on the principles of individual conscience and individual interpretation of the Bible, apart from the “Tradition” of the Church. Historically, Catholicism valued individual conscience as a God-given gift that can lead the individual to virtue. However, while the Catholic Church felt under siege from Protestantism and advancing Islam, this value was surrendered to the greater concern for obedience to the Church’s teachings.

Protestant rationalism coupled with Renaissance humanism prepared the way for modern ethics, based on human reason and individual conscience. This brings us to the eve of the Enlightenment, a new period in the history of Ethics.

Related reading: Aims and Means of Early Jesuit Education; Christopher Marlowe and the Golden Age of England; The Trial of Galileo; Machiavelli Believed in Fortune


Thursday, June 5, 2014

Machiavelli Believed in Fortune


Portrait of Machiavelli by Santi di Tito 
Niccoló Machiavelli (1469-1527) was the most original political thinker of the Renaissance. In many ways, he was ahead of his time. His political realism finds expression in aspects of utilitarianism and in Nietzsche's Uber Mensch philosophy.

Benedetto Croce (1925) concludes Machiavelli is simply a realist or political pragmatist who accurately states that moral values do not affect the decisions that political leaders make. Ernst Cassirer (1946) held that Machiavelli was a political scientist in distinguishing between the "facts" of political life and the "values" of moral judgment.

In his book The Prince, Machiavelli provides instructions to the “new prince” on how to stabilize his power and retain control of his realm. He urges the prince to appear benevolent to the public while privately acting as ruthlessly as necessary to squash his political opponents. He argues that this approach will achieve the greater good by maintaining stability. This represents a radical break with traditional political ethics that stress justice and prudence on the part of philosopher kings. Consider the contrast between Aristotle and Machiavelli.

Aristotle wrote: There are some actions and emotions whose very names connote baseness, e.g., spite, shamelessness, envy; and among actions, adultery, theft, and murder. These and similar emotions and actions imply by their very names that they are bad... It is, therefore, impossible ever to do right in performing them: to perform them is always wrong.

Machiavelli wrote that it is not necessary for a prince to have the qualities of honestly, kindness, loyalty, etc, but it is necessary to seem to have them…useful it is to seem compassionate, trustworthy, humane, endowed with integrity, religious, and to be such, but to be in such a condition, with one’s spirit so constructed, that, when you need to not possess these qualities, you are prepared and know how to shift to the contrary qualities… Let, then, a prince act in such a manner as to conquer and maintain his estate, and the means will always be judged honorable, and they will be praised by everyone – since the crowd is always going to be taken in by appearances and results, and in the world there is no one but the crowd…

Machiavelli believed that the first responsibility of the ruler is to increase and maintain his power. He advocated that the ruler be bold and intelligent in shaping his fortune. Fortune for Machiavelli meant fortifying one's position by whatever means possible, even if this called for ruthless actions. He proposed this definition of acceptable cruelty: Whatever is done to one’s enemy must be swift, effective and short-lived. In other words, when taking the life of a political opponent it should be done as painlessly as possible, secretly, and without collateral damage.

Machiavelli was critical of Christianity. In his opinion, Christianity, along with teleological Aristotelianism embraced by the Medieval church, allowed decisions to be guided by imaginary ideals and encouraged people to leave events up to providence. This is why Leo Strauss believed that The Prince was secretly a treatise against religion.

Machiavelli disdained what Nietzsche called "otherworldly hopes." He would have resonated with Nietzsche's exhortation: "Behold, I teach you the overman. The overman is the meaning of the earth. Let your will say: the overman shall be the meaning of the earth! I beseech you, my brothers, remain faithful to the earth, and do not believe those who speak to you of otherworldly hopes!"

Machiavelli did not believe in divine providence, fate, or chance. He believed in fortune. The word "fortune" expresses the idea of making strong or fortifying. One's fortune is not left to chance, but forged by character and effort. When someone says, "May you have good fortune," they wish for you positive returns for your hard work.

He wrote in The Prince (Chapter 1) that new principalities are won by "the arms of others or with his own, either by fortune or prowess." In other words, a ruler comes into power by his own strengthening of his position. While it was in keeping with classical ethics to say that leaders should have virtue, especially prudence, Machiavelli's use of the words virtù and prudenza imply ambition and cunning. He believed that virtue and prudence help a man control his future. Good fortune comes by control of one's future.


Related reading: Ethics in the Renaissance; Chance, Fortune, Determinism and Indeterminism

Sunday, May 12, 2013

Ethical Concerns of the Renaissance


Nicholas Copernicus


Alice C. Linsley


Timeline

Pico della Mirandola: 1463 – 1494 AD
Niccoló Machiavelli: 1469 – 1527 AD
Copernicus: 1473 – 1543 AD
Michelangelo: 1475 – 1564 AD
Emperor Charles V: 1500 – 1558 AD
John Calvin: 1509 – 1564 AD
Jesuit Order founded: 1540 AD
Giordano Bruno: 1548 – 1600 AD
Jacob Böehme : 1575 – 1624 AD
Period of Religious Wars: 1560 – 1598 AD
Spanish Armada defeated: 1588 AD


The Renaissance was a cultural movement beginning in the 14th century that involved renewed interest in classical Greek and Roman culture, especially the arts and sciences. It was a time of great artistic achievement and many art works were inspired by pagan mythology. At the same time, the Catholic Church commissioned some of the greatest artists to paint and sculpt works for use in the basilicas and churches around Europe. This is how Michelangelo came to paint the ceiling of the Sistine Chapel in Vatican City.

There was spirit of yearning for new things and a struggle between the old traditions and the hopeful ambitions of young rulers such as Niccoló Machiavelli. The Copernican system shifted thinking from mankind and earth as the center of the universe (anthropocentric) to solar-centrism. This idea was extended to consideration of many possible universes spiraling around many suns. Nicholas Copernicus (1473-1543) faced challenges and hardships is his attempts to better understand the universe, yet he always maintained a personal ethic that placed truth as the highest value. He wrote, "[It is my] loving duty to seek the truth in all things, in so far as God has granted that to human reason."

In the area of natural theology there was a tendency toward monism, especially in the work of Jacob Böehme (1575–1624) and Giordano Bruno (1548–1600). Böehme conceived of the world as a living tree which from crown to roots was sustained by one life-giving sap. This was his metaphor for God. He thought of God as an “all-knowing, all-seeing, all-hearing, all-smelling, all-tasting” spirit.

This conception of the world as a living organism animated by the Spirit was developed also in Bruno’s writings. Instead of sap, Bruno’s metaphor was the all-animating light that shines where God directs just as an artist’s paintings require light. Bruno was influenced by Arab astronomy, Neoplatonism and Renaissance Hermeticism. Bruno lived for a while in Germany where he was excommunicated by the Lutherans for his pantheistic and unorthodox religious views. On February 17, 1600 Bruno was burned at the stake because he rejected the divinity of Christ, regarding Jesus as merely a skillful magician.

The Renaissance was also a period of educational reform during which many colleges and universities were established, especially by the Jesuits. Jesuit colleges and universities became the standard for excellence in Europe.


A time like our own?

The Renaissance began in Italy and spread to the rest of Europe, reaching England by the 16th century and northern Europe by the mid-17th century. This period must be viewed against the backdrop of religious upheaval and bloody conflict, the Bubonic plague, and the imperialism of the Ottoman Turks.

In some ways the Renaissance was a time like our own. We too face religious upheaval as is seen most recently within the worldwide of Anglican Communion which has split over the issues of women priests and ordination of non-celibate homosexuals. We have seen renewed interest in Paganism, in the form of Druid religion and Wicca. We live with new diseases such as Ebola and HIV/AIDS, and the resurgence of resistant strains of old diseases such a Tuberculosis and Polio. In education, parents are seeking alternatives to public schools, such as charter schools, home schooling and classical education schools. As Muslims of the Ottoman Empire sought to expand their territory, Jihadists today seek to establish a world empire under Islamic Law (Sharia).

The discovery of the New World expanded geographical horizons and stimulated European imaginations and economies. Likewise today we look to the heavens to discover new worlds and new perceptions of the world in which we live. Cooperative space exploration may lead to the discovery of habitable planets in other galaxies. The very thought stimulates the imagination and nurtures technological development.

This lesson concentrates on the 15th and 16th centuries because it was during these centuries that the key ethical questions of the Renaissance came into focus. The ethical questions of the Renaissance that will be addressed in this lesson are:

· The Dignity of Man
· Responsibility of the Wealthy
· Reform of Education and Healthcare
· The Power of Rulers
· Religious Intolerance and War
· Conscience and Individual Interpretation


On the dignity of Man

As we have seen in our study of the Middle Ages, the question of Human Nature was addressed by both Catholicism and Lutheranism. The Catholic position held that while humans are sinful due to the fall of Man, the image of God (imago Dei) with which humans were originally created is not fully erased. Human dignity is derived from being made in the “image and likeness of God.” The Reformers Martin Luther and John Calvin did not deny that humans were created in God’s image, but they believed that that the fall so thoroughly corrupted us that we were robbed of our original dignity.

Our sinfulness is such that we no longer are free to desire communion with God. Our wills are in bondage to sin and we stand before the Creator as filthy beggars.

During the Renaissance, Luther’s view would be met by numerous challenges as Humanism developed. Humanism emphasizes the dignity of Man and the possibilities of rewards in this life, rather than rewards in heaven. Renaissance humanism represents a reaction against Church authority. It shifted the focus from Creator God to human creativity and from the supernatural to the natural. During the Renaissance, human achievements and creative potential took center stage. Humanist writers were able to share their ideas because of the development of printing.

The debate over the dignity of man was fed by both scientific discovery and humanistic literature. Copernicus proved that the sun was at the center of the planetary system, rather than earth, radically altering the worldview of many learned people. This was significant because earth and humanity could no longer be regarded as the center of the universe.

At the same time, the Italian philosopher Giovanni Pico della Mirandola, in a work titled “Oration on the Dignity of Man” exalted humanity as being capable of rising to the level of angels through philosophical speculation (here we see the continuing influence of Plato). He pictured humans between beasts and angels and insisted that by allowing reason to rule our emotions, we ascend to the level of angels. By acting against reason, we descend to the level of beasts. He asserted that only human beings could change themselves since humans alone have free will. His Oration on the Dignity of Man is considered the Manifesto of the Renaissance.

Christopher Marlowe’s play Doctor Faustus shows the spirit of humanism in the character of Faustus who aspires to superhuman powers by making a pact with the devil. Faustus is both exalted and punished. He embodies the Renaissance fear of breaking with tradition and the fascination with pushing the boundaries of human endeavor.

The play opens with a monologue by Faust who is sitting in his study. He is contemplating all that he has studied and discovers that he is dissatisfied with his understanding of the world. As with Descartes, he has decided that his learning has not brought him to certainty; that he knows nothing after all. Faust seeks knowledge in Nostradamus and from an Earth-spirit.

As Faust reflects on the lessons of the Earth-spirit, his bookish friend Wagner invites him to take a walk. This scene comes after Faust’s tinkering with the idea of suicide. The sound of church bells on Easter morning prevent him, not out of religious obligation, but because they remind him of his happier days as a child.

Wagner and Faust take a walk into the town, where people are celebrating Easter. They hail Faust as he passes them because Faust's father, an alchemist himself, cured the plague. Faust is in a black mood. As they walk among the promenading villagers, Faust reveals to Wagner his inner conflict. Faust and Wagner see a dog, who they do not know is Mephistopheles in disguise, which follows them into the town.

Faust returns to his study, and the dog follows him. Faust translates the prologue of John’s Gospel, but cannot make sense of the first sentence – “In the beginning was the Logos, and the Logos was with God, and the Logos was God.” He decides to translate it "In the beginning was the deed." Herein Faust demonstrates his lack of understanding the ancient Greek and of the Gospel itself. In his ignorance of God’s Word he is defenseless against Mephistopheles’urging to sign a pact with the devil in his own blood.

Doctor Faustus was performed twenty-five times between October 1594 and October 1597 and was one of the most popular plays of Renaissance England. The troupe that performed Marlowe’s play was called The Admiral’s Men because they were supported financially by their patron Charles Howard, 1st Earl of Nottingham, who commanded a squadron of ships escorting the Queen of Spain on a state visit in 1570.

Medieval patronage of the arts reached its peak during the Renaissance. Nobles vied with the Church for the services of the best artists, poets and philosophers. Wealthy families provided housing, food and a stipend in exchange for an artist’s work. Renaissance patronage made it possible for people like Michelangelo and Leonardo da Vinci to dedicate themselves to their work, but this was not without problems, as we will discover when we explore the ethics of patronage.


Responsibility of nobles and rulers

During the Renaissance the ideal nobleman was a literate and refined gentleman of courtly manners. He had responsibility for the care of servants, peasants and family members, which for noblemen of limited resources posed a considerable challenge. It was also a time when nobles sought to be patrons of great artists in order to gain social status.

Throughout the Middle Ages the Church had been the primary patron of the arts, but during the Renaissance new systems of patronage developed, such as family, organization and city-state patronage. An organization might commission work from an artist and provide his material needs until that work was finished. The Florentine wool guild, for example, was responsible for the adornment of the Cathedral in Florence and commissioned religious paintings and sculptures for that building.

The Renaissance saw greater centralization of power among wealthy rulers, sometimes called “new monarchs.” These were men who were able to command armies to control and even expand their territories. After a period of famine, plague and self-serving medieval chivalry, the new monarchs stirred Europe out of decline by forming new allegiances through Renaissance diplomacy and warfare. However, power struggles between kings also resulted in the destruction of lands and holdings. This was especially evident in Italy where the German Hapsburg kings and the French Valois kings engaged in a prolonged political tug-o-war.

Religion continued to play a role in government. Nowhere was this more evident than in Calvin’s Geneva where the Consistory maintained control over all aspects of civil and religious life. The Consistory was comprised of pastors and elders elected by district. It maintained church discipline and dictated morality throughout the city. Calvin used the Consistory to advance his political aims and to respond harshly to those who challenged his authority. Some of his opponents were tortured and beheaded, and those accused of witchcraft were hunted and burned alive. In 1545, the Consistory charged 23 people with practicing witchcraft, and they were burned at the stake in Geneva. Calvin's acceptance of torture and the execution of witches and heretics was not unusual among rulers of that time.


Machiavellian ethics

By far the most significant political philosopher of the Renaissance was Niccoló Machiavelli (1469-1527) whose writings on statesmanship have brought him notoriety for his ruthless tactics. 

Machiavelli took a pragmatic approach to the responsibility of rulers. He believed that the first responsibility of the ruler is to increase and maintain his power. In the course of his diplomatic missions within Italy he was able to study the political tactics of some of Italy’s most cunning rulers, particularly those of Cesare Borgia, the illegitimate son of Pope Alexander VI, who through military prowess was enlarging his holdings in central Italy.

Machiavelli believed that bold and intelligent initiative on the part of a ruler could shape his fortune. In his thinking human dignity was something that one gained by exercise of the will to rule. In his book The Prince, Machiavelli provides instructions to the “new prince” on how to stabilize his power and retain control of his realm. He urges the prince to appear to be benevolent while privately acting as ruthlessly as necessary to squash his political opponents. He argues that this approach will achieve the greater good by maintaining stability.

Machiavelli established guidelines for ruthless actions. He proposed this definition of acceptable cruelty: Whatever is done to one’s enemy must be swift, effective and short-lived. In other words, when taking the life of a political opponent it should be done as painlessly as possible, secretly, and without collateral damage.

We see how Machiavelli’s ethics depart from the ethical thought of Socrates, Plato and Aristotle when we compare his writings with those of these great philosophers. Consider the following:

Machiavelli wrote that it is not necessary for a prince to have the qualities of honestly, kindness, loyalty, etc, “but it is necessary to seem to have them…useful it is to seem compassionate, trustworthy, humane, endowed with integrity, religious, and to be such, but to be in such a condition, with one’s spirit so constructed, that, when you need to not possess these qualities, you are prepared and know how to shift to the contrary qualities… Let, then, a prince act in such a manner as to conquer and maintain his estate, and the means will always be judged honorable, and they will be praised by everyone – since the crowd is always going to be taken in by appearances and results, and in the world there is no one but the crowd…”

Aristotle wrote: “There are some actions and emotions whose very names connote baseness, e.g., spite, shamelessness, envy; and among actions, adultery, theft, and murder. These and similar emotions and actions imply by their very names that they are bad... It is, therefore, impossible ever to do right in performing them: to perform them is always wrong.”


Reform of education and healthcare

The Jesuit Order was founded by the Spaniard Ignatius of Loyola. When Ignatius was born in 1491, Europe was entering into the Renaissance. The first Jesuits were ordained to the Catholic priesthood in Venice and offered themselves in service to Pope Paul III, who approved the order in 1540. Ignatius served as General Superior until his death in 1556 at the age of 65. During his lifetime Jesuit missionaries went to China and to South America. Jesuit priests founded several towns in Brazil, including São Paulo and Rio de Janeiro.

The Society of Jesus dedicated itself to education. The first Jesuit schools adopted the curriculum of the Renaissance humanist academies which included Greek and Latin poetry, oratory, drama, mathematics, theology and history. When Ignatius' died in 1556, the Jesuits were operating 74 colleges on three continents, and by 1626 the order had established 400 colleges throughout Europe. Jesuit colleges and universities became the standard for excellence in Europe and from them came some of the greatest minds of history: Miguel de Cervantes, René Descartes and Voltaire, to name a few.

The Catholic Church funded schools and charity work to the poor through its parishes and religious orders throughout Europe. Priests, nuns and lay clerics staffed schools and hospitals, providing care to even the poorest citizens, and even better care to those who could pay! Where Protestantism became the established religion, as in northern Germany, these educational and charitable efforts were taken over by Protestants.


Religious intolerance

The Renaissance was not a time when people could change their religion without consequences. For example, Roman Catholics living in northern Germany faced religious persecution when that region became Protestant. To escape trouble, many moved to southern Germany which remained Catholic. Moving away was one way to escape religious persecution.

The Treaty of Augsburg, signed in 1555, was between Emperor Ferdinand (who replaced his brother Charles V as Holy Roman Emperor) and the Lutheran princes of northern Germany. It was supposed to lessen religious strife throughout Europe, but it actually made matters worse because it caused Calvinist Protestants to flee to the Spanish (Catholic) Netherlands where they spread their beliefs and launched a staunch guerrilla war against the Spanish troops posted in the Netherlands.

When Philip II came to the throne in Spain, he inherited the religious conflict in the Netherlands, and determined to wipe out the Protestant rebellion. His troops viciously put down riots and protests in Holland and Belgium. To uproot Protestantism from the Netherlands, Philip arranged for the Netherlands to have 14 new Catholic bishops, many of whom were trained Inquisitors. The rebellion that ensued dragged on until 1648 and become part of the wider European struggle known as the Thirty Years War.

In 1566, the Duke of Alva with an army of 10,000 Spanish troops burned Calvinist churches, executed their leaders, and nearly extinguished the Calvinist resistance. However, Calvinist sea raiders gained control of some ports in the North. When word spread of these Calvinist safe ports, more Calvinists flocked Holland. The result of this migration is that northern Holland became and remains today primarily Protestant.

France also saw rising tensions between Calvinists and Catholics that triggered anarchy, and weakening the government. The Catholic majority of France opposed an influential minority of French Calvinists known as “Huguenots.” The Huguenots had the advantage of living primarily in the fortified southern cities and had the support of many nobles who provided excellent leadership. Catholic and Huguenot armies battled in France for almost thirty years, destroying fields, homes and lives. Seven religious wars were fought in France and the fighting often involved the massacre of women and children. From 1562-157l, there were five massacres of Catholics and eighteen massacres of Protestants, the most notorious being the Saint Bartholomew's Day Massacre (1572), when armed Catholics in Paris fell upon local and visiting Calvinists, killing 3000.

Spain used the unrest in France to intervene in France’s internal affairs. Tensions between Protestant England and Catholic Spain led the English to raid Spanish shipping and support the revolt in the Spanish Netherlands. Meanwhile Philip II conspired to dethrone Elizabeth I. The eclipse of Spain’s military and naval power came in 1588 when the English defeated the Spanish Armada.


Conscience and Individual Interpretation

During the Renaissance, Protestants developed ethical methods quite different from Roman Catholics. The Protestant method is based on the principles of individual conscience and individual interpretation of the Bible, apart from the “Tradition” of the Church. The Protestant emphasis increased as the Roman Church became more defensive. Historically, the Roman Church held individual conscience in high regard as a God-given gift that can lead the individual to Virtue. However, the place of individual conscience in Catholicism gave way to demands for unquestioning obedience to the Church’s teachings. This was a result of the challenges the Papacy faced from the Islamic Ottoman Empire in the east and the spread of Protestantism in the west.

As Protestants rejected the Vatican’s teaching authority, they asserted for themselves new authorities: the individual’s conscience, private interpretation of the Bible apart from catholic Tradition, and the importance of reason. Protestant Reformers stressed the infallibility of the Bible but they never defined what this meant in terms of divine revelation, so the individual became his own Bible teacher, regardless of how well informed. The understanding of Bible texts became a matter of private interpretation and much philosophical speculation. Philipp Melanchthon (1497-1560), a leading Reformer during the Renaissance, attempted (less successfully than Aquinas) to marry Christianity and Aristotelian philosophy in his “Elementa philosohaiae moralis.” 

Baron Samuel Pufendorf, a German Rationalist, prepared the way for the Enlightenment to spread throughout Germany. Along with the French philosopher, Descartes, Pufendorf concluded that the individual’s reason is the ultimate ground for deciding between good and evil, between truth and falsehood. 

With Protestantism the doors opened to the secularization of Western Europe. Coupled with Renaissance humanism and rationalism, Protestant thought prepared the way for the modern world and modern ethics, based not of religious considerations, but on human reason and a liberal view of human rights. The modern age would retain a place for God, but would move from a Christian worldview to Deism as the basis for natural law and ethical decisions.

Deists do not believe that God has personal interest in the world’s affairs, and certainly not in the affairs of individuals. The Deistic God rarely intervenes. There are no miracles, no angels, and no devil. Most Deists grant the existence of the soul, but not all Deists believe that the soul is eternal. 

A reaction against this cold rational view of God and religion was the Pietist movement of the 17th and 18th centuries. The emphasis of Pietism on mystical inward experience of God had an impact on ethics. The Pietist Pastor Francis Magny held that "mysticism and the moral law went together." His pupil, Fracoise-Louise de la Tour, believed that "pietist mysticism did less to reinforce the moral law than to take its place...the principle of 'guidance by inner light' was often a signal to follow the most intense of her inner sentiments...the supremacy of feeling over reason."


Summary

During the Renaissance, rulers felt an obligation to provide for artists and musicians who in turn would offer their services to their wealthy patrons. The more artists one could support, the more social status one had. Machiavelli believed that the ruler was to appear to be just and generous while dealing ruthlessly with his political opponents in secret. For Machiavelli, social status and wealth were gained by exercise of the will to power.

Protestantism greatly influenced ethics during the Renaissance. Protestants developed ethical methods based on the principles of individual conscience and individual interpretation of the Bible, apart from the “Tradition” of the Church. Historically, Roman Catholicism held individual conscience in high regard as a God-given gift that can lead the individual to Virtue. However, while the Catholic Church felt under siege by spreading Protestantism and advancing Islam, this value was surrendered to the greater concern for unquestioning obedience to the Church’s teachings.

Protestant rationalism opened the doors to the secularization of Western Europe. Coupled with Renaissance humanism, Protestant thought prepared the way for modern ethics, based on human reason and a liberal view of human rights.

Some Protestants departed from Christianity and become Deists. Many of the Founding Fathers of the United States were Deists. Thomas Jefferson is an example. These thinkers moved natural law from the Christian concept of moral obligation to God’s laws to moral obligation to defend individual liberty and the right of property.

Deism among the leaders of the nation, combined with the Calvinist work ethic that was brought to the colonies by the Puritans, encouraged the very American value of private property as a personal good. The prosperous landowner was seen as a man blessed by God. Nobody wanted to appear poor as this might be perceived as a sign that God’s blessing was absent.


Related reading: Ethics of the Middle Ages; Ethics of Ancient GreeceEthics of Archaic Communities