INDEX

Topics are arranged alphabetically in the INDEX.

Thursday, August 27, 2026

Doing the Real Work of Philosophy


P.D. Magnus is a Professor of Philosophy at University of Albany SUNY. His research addresses the philosophy of science, the philosophy of art and music, the epistemology of technology, and pragmatism.




By P.D. Magnus

When I write philosophy, my task is not merely to generate the most persuasive argument for some target claim. Rather, my task is to figure out what I ought to say. I often have the experience of setting out to write a paper with a conclusion in view, only to find that spelling out the argument in detail leaves me not believing the conclusion anymore. The arguments instead lead elsewhere.

I expect this experience is familiar. It reveals that writing philosophy is (or at least can be) more a matter of figuring out what to think than it is of figuring out how to express pre-existing ideas. I start a paper with a conclusion in mind, but I end up making discoveries through the process of writing. Careful writing is a way of exploring the space of ideas and settling my own mind about them.

Dr. Magnus concludes that reliance on "the algorithmic average of philosophical discourse, would be a kind of bad faith—a refusal to genuinely do philosophy."


Monday, July 20, 2026

Tech Firms Hiring Philosophers

 



Making a living as a philosopher has never been easy. There are limited positions and the competition is fierce. However, the AI boom offers hope. Major tech firms such as Anthropic and Google DeepMind are hiring philosophers to tackle public policy challenges by drawing on their background in epistemology, logic, and ethics.

This trend is especially evident in the US, UK, and Australia where analytic philosophy dominates with its focus on formal logic, philosophy of science, and analytic metaphysics.

Unlike the philosophers of old, the philosopher today is likely to do much of his or her work sitting in front of a computer. They use digital tools to model complex ethical frameworks, analyze vast datasets of text, and structure philosophical arguments.


Monday, June 22, 2026

Encyclopedia of Women Philosophers

 


Martha Nussbaum in 2008


A New Web Site Presents the Contributions of Women Philosophers, from Ancient to Modern


In the research on which Lombrozo reports, studies found that “the biggest drop in the proportion of women in the philosophy pipeline seems to be from enrollment in an introductory philosophy class to becoming a philosophy major. At Georgia State, for example, women make up about 55 percent of Introduction to Philosophy students but only around 33 percent of philosophy majors.” This may have to do with the fact that “readings on the syllabus were overwhelmingly by men (over 89 percent).”

As Georgia State graduate student Morgan Thompson explained at a conference in 2013:
This problem is compounded by the fact that introductory philosophy textbooks have an even worse gender balance; women account for only 6 percent of authors in a number of introductory philosophy textbooks.

In a conversation with Julian Baggini on why there are so few women in academic philosophy, Mary Warnock once noted that “of all the humanities departments in British universities, only philosophy departments have a mere 25% women members.” That number is even lower in the US. “Why should this be?” Warnock asked. She asserted that the problem may lie with the discipline itself. “I think that academic philosophy has become an extraordinarily inward-looking subject,” she said, “If you pick up a professional journal now, you find little nitpicking responses to previous articles. Women tend to get more easily bored with this than men. Philosophy seems to stop being interesting just when it starts to be professional.”



Tuesday, April 14, 2026

Two Types of Binary Reasoning

 


Dr. Alice C. Linsley

Recently, I read an article critical of people who were "binary" thinkers, by which the author meant people who tend to classify information in one of two categories: true or false, black or white. He called this binary thinking. Though not the only definition of binary thinking, his is the most common and generally accepted definition.

If one does an internet search using the phrase "binary reasoning" this comes up on Goggle: 
Binary reasoning is a system of logic where information is categorized into only two, mutually exclusive states—typically TRUE (1) or FALSE (0). Used in computer logic and analytical reasoning, it simplifies complex problems by allowing only two, non-overlapping possibilities (e.g., truth-tellers vs. liars). 

According to this definition, binary reasoning has an either-or framework that does not allow for contradiction (only one can be true) or hierarchy (both are true but one has higher authority).

The Goggle definition reflects the Aristotelian logic that dominates Western philosophy. It does not recognize the much older and more complex binary reasoning of the early Hebrew (4000-2000 BCE). Were we to investigate the Hebrew binary reasoning we would discover that it breaks out of the either-or framework by recognizing hierarchy rather than non-contradiction. Binary reasoning is the way humans make sense of features in Nature that signal something beyond. The Semitic way of thinking allows for both-and. It opens an avenue for the exploration of the "and".

Western philosophy recognizes the logic of non-contradiction. However, the original arguments made by Aristotle are not that simple. Aristotle presented three versions of the principle of non-contradiction: an ontological, a doxastic (opinion), and a semantic version. The first version concerns things that exist in the world, the second is about what we believe, and the third relates to assertions about truth.

The binary reasoning that pertains to the ontological are the most significant. These are observations of binary sets in Nature. Here we find hierarchy, that is to say, things exist even when they exist as a trace, to borrow Derrida's term.

It is fascinating that both the Structuralist Claude Lévi-Strauss and the Deconstructionist Jacques Derrida began with binary reasoning.

Lévi-Strauss (1908–2009) founded structural anthropology, proposing that universal mental structures or patterns shape human culture. He argued that human thought operates through binary oppositions (e.g., raw/cooked, nature/culture). On the basis of his anthropological research, he argued that the "primitive" mind has the same structures as the "civilized" mind. He believed that myths, kinship, and customs can be decoded to reveal these mental structures. He came to these conclusions based on his 1930s fieldwork among the Bororo and Nambikwara peoples of the Amazon and Matto Grosso. His experiences and structuralist theories were documented in his 1955 memoir, Tristes Tropiques.

Jacques Derrida (1930-2004) was born into a Sephardic Jewish family in El-Biar, Algeria. He sought to uncover the underbelly of meaning in myths and texts. He enjoyed making fun of traditional interpretations, yet as he developed his "ontotheology" he concluded that there was something fixed at the metaphysical center. He developed this in his lectures at Villanova University.

Deconstruction reveals a “presence” that has been called by different names throughout history: logos, nous, arche, God, the metaphysical center, etc. However, for Derrida the fixed presence is not a being, but rather a necessary function by which we are able to discover meaning. 

Derrida’s deconstruction reveals great complexity of meaning in written texts, ideas, myths and human customs. He wanted to know what dominates and blocks what seems not to be present. He ascribes to subordinate objects a more substantial existence than the shadow they cast, or their “trace.” Derrida wrote: "Deconstruction cannot limit itself or proceed immediately to neutralization: it must, by means of a double gesture, a double science, a double writing, practice an overturning of the classical opposition, and a general displacement of the system. It is on that condition alone that deconstruction will provide the means of intervening in the field of oppositions it criticizes" (Metaphysics).

Derrida identified binary distinctions, such as dominance and subservience, central and marginalized, and reversals. Each component of the binary set means something, and the relationship of the oppositions means something, and the hierarchy exhibited by the set means something. The reversal of the oppositions also means something. The reversal of the subordinated term of an opposition is a significant aspect of Derrida's strategy. In examining a binary opposition and reversals, deconstruction brings to light traces of meaning that cannot be said to be present, but which have metaphysical presence.

Derrida explores the hidden presence. In so doing, deeper and/or unfamiliar meanings emerge. His method involves neutralizing the shouting voice in order to hear resonances of underlying voices. He looks for Plato behind Aristotle, for mystery behind logic, and for the metaphysical behind the physical. His reversals are a strategic intervention to free western philosophy from the constraints of materialism and the deductive and linear reasoning in ancient Greece. In a true sense, Derrida lifted up a Semitic way of reasoning. (See Jeff Benner on Greek Linear Logic vs. Hebrew Step Logic.)

In summary, there are two distinct types of binary reasoning. The West is heir to both, but the earlier binary reasoning of the biblical Hebrew has been largely ignored and forgotten.


Binary Reasoning of the Biblical Hebrew

The binary reasoning of the early Hebrew involves binary sets of two closely related entities which, when observed empirically, reveal that one of the entities is greater than its partner. Genesis 1:16 speaks of the sun and the moon as a binary set and notes that the sun is the greater of the two. Likewise, in the male-female set, it is universally true that the human male is anatomically larger and stronger than the female.

Not all pairs of opposites are binary sets. Consider that talented-untalented does not represent a binary set because this involves subjective judgement. Tall-short is not a binary set because this is relative to the observer. For example, the tall-short contrast is relative to the observer. I am 5 feet 5 inches tall. Standing beside a Watusi warrior, I would appear to be short. However, were I to stand beside a Pygmy, I would appear to be tall.

The binary reasoning of the Bible is based on the early Hebrew priests' acute observation of patterns in Nature. It prevents the biblical worldview from slipping into dualism, a view in which the two entities of a set are equal in every way.

Tuesday, January 27, 2026

Between Continental and Analytic Philosophers

 

Naturalism emphasizes science as the primary source of knowledge about the physical universe, humans, and the natural order. It can go to such extremes as to deny mystery and reject all supernatural beliefs. When this happens if nods toward Logical Positivism. Logical Positivism held two key beliefs: (1) absolute confidence in empirical experience as the only source of knowledge; and (2) logical analysis performed with the help of symbolic logic is the single method for solving philosophical problems.

A more moderate naturalism, such as that of the late Loren C. Eiseley, allows room for mystery. Eiseley was an American philosopher and naturalist whose published works over 2 decades influenced many young science writers. 

Walter Veit Ph.D., wrote, "While naturalist philosophy is often strawmanned as a naive scientism, I hope to encourage my readers to seriously consider it as a different and more pluralistic way of seeing philosophy altogether, one that draws on the plurality of the sciences, rather than the traditionally restrictive, a priori toolkit of analytic philosophy." 

He adds, "Naturalist philosophers are excited about the progress made on old philosophical problems with the aid of the sciences—the mind, the nature of life, or the structure of reality."

To make philosophy prosper once more in universities and the public, we must ask it to return to a state it was once in: a part of natural philosophy continuous with the sciences.

Veit states, "Anecdotally, I have never felt more enthusiastic about the future of philosophy, then when I was able to work together with scientists, such as Nicola Clayton’s lab, to bring us closer to answering what it is like to be a crow, my work with biologists at Oxford in measuring biological complexity, or my ongoing work on several projects together with animal welfare scientists. Young philosophers in search of a shared and progressing paradigm won’t have far to look. It is not all doom and gloom."

Read it all here: A Third Kind of Philosophy | Psychology Today


Sunday, November 30, 2025

Tolstoy on the Church

 

"Lev Tolstoy in Yasnaya Polyana" (1908) the first color photo portrait in Russia. 

Wikimedia Commons


Leo Tolstoy (1828-1910)

"Nowhere nor in anything, except in the assertion of the Church, can we find that God or Christ founded anything like what churchmen understand by the Church."


In reality, what we refer to as "the Church" is a Tradition that the early followers of Jesus Messiah received from their Hebrew ancestors (4000-2000 BC). That Messianic Tradition is what shapes the Church. Without it, the Church would not exist.

Before Judaism emerged as a world religion there was a Messianic Tradition among Abraham's Hebrew ancestors. The early Hebrew were a ruler-priest caste that believed in God Father and God Son. The "son" was called HR in Proto-Egyptian, meaning "Most High One" or "Hidden One".  

The Horite and Sethite Hebrew dispersed throughout the Ancient Near East and into central Africa. The oldest known site of Horite Hebrew worship is Nekhen, an ancient city that stretched for two miles along the Nile. Votive offerings at the Nekhen temple were ten times larger than the normal mace heads and bowls found elsewhere, suggesting that this was a very prestigious shrine. Horite Hebrew priests placed invocations and prayers to Re (Father) and HR (Hur/Heru/Hor/Horus) at the summit of the fortress as the sun rose. For the early Hebrew, the sun was the symbol of God Father and the co-equal Son. They viewed the solar arc as God's path through the heavens.

The Son was also called Y-Shu, which is the basis of the name Yeshua, translated "Jesus in English Bibles. According to the early Nilotic Hebrew, the first act of the Creator at the beginning was šw (Shu), meaning light. This is not the light of day. It is the eternal, uncreated light associated with the High God's son Y-shu (Yeshua), as proclaimed in John's Prologue.

What has been taught concerning the Church's foundation has been inadequate because it assumes that Christianity was a Jewish sect. Creedal Christianity represents the holy Tradition received from Abraham and his Hebrew ancestors long before Judaism existed.




Wednesday, October 15, 2025

An Interview with Hannah Arendt

 

Hannah Arendt in 1957 (Wikipedia)


Johannah “Hannah” Arendt (1906 – 1975) was a Jewish philosopher who left Nazi Germany. She lived in nearby European countries before finally settling in the United States. Her thoughts were shaped by experiences of two world wars.

She was a political philosopher who felt she didn't belong to the "circle" of professional philosophers. Listen to her story and unique perspective.


Related reading: Big Thinker: Who was Hannah Arendt? - The Ethics CentreThe philosophy of violence: Hannah Arendt and the banality of brutality - AOAV


Monday, September 29, 2025

Philosophy Actively Seeks Logical Clarity

 



Ludwig Wittgenstein, an Austrian-British philosopher, was one of the most influential thinkers of the 20th century. His work contributed to various movements in analytic and linguistic philosophy. He studied at Trinity College, Cambridge with Bertrand Russell. As colleagues, Russell and Wittgenstein developed their view called “logical atomism.”

Russell inspired Wittgenstein to consider the nature of thought itself. Russell was famous for statements like these:

“Thought is subversive and revolutionary, destructive and terrible. Thought is merciless to privilege, established institutions, and comfortable habit. Thought is great and swift and free.”

“Do not fear to be eccentric in opinion, for every opinion now accepted was once eccentric.”

Thursday, September 25, 2025

Aristotle's Prime Mover

 


Aristotle, marble portrait bust, Roman copy of a Greek original (c. 325 BC) in the Museo Nazionale Romano, Rome, Italy.


This is for all who love to explore Aristotle's cosmology and his understanding of the Divine. The Prime Mover is above all other movers. The notion of an immaterial High Deity was not uncommon among populations of the Ancient World. 

Excerpt:

In On The Heavens, Aristotle describes ether as the nearest element to the divine due to its perfect and eternal natural motion. Unlike the rectilinear motion of the sublunar elements, the natural motion of ether is circular.

Circular motion is continuous and eternal because a circle, unlike a line, has neither a beginning nor an end. Hence, everything in the supralunary region is eternal, changeless, ungenerated, and imperishable. For all these reasons, Aristotle considered the supralunary region more perfect than the sublunar domain.
The question yet to be answered is what causes the motion of the supralunary region? Given that every movement needs a mover and the Aristotelian cosmos is spatially finite, the series of movers-moved cannot indefinitely extend. As a result, all the series of motion must start with a first mover that is itself unmoved. The Prime Mover is the divine, metaphysical, and immaterial unmoved mover that is the original source of motion in the entire cosmos.
Aristotle argues, however, that the intricate motion of the celestial spheres cannot all be explained by the movement of the sphere of the fixed stars. Hence, in Metaphysics, he proposes that, in addition to the Prime Mover, there are multiple unmoved movers that cause each motion in the supralunary region that the motion of the fixed stars doesn’t account for. As Botteri and Casazza explain in The Astronomical System of Aristotle, these unmoved movers are finite in number, each associated with a celestial sphere. Like the Prime Mover, the unmoved movers are divine, metaphysical, and immaterial. However, they are subordinate to the Prime Mover because they are not responsible for the motion of the entire cosmos, but only partially responsible for the motion of the celestial spheres.

 

Read more here: What Is Aristotle’s Divine Blueprint for the Cosmos? | TheCollector


Saturday, July 12, 2025

Friedrich von Hayek: Free Market Advocate

 



Friedrich A. Hayek (1899–1992) was an important economist and political philosopher of the twentieth century. He is widely regarded as the principal intellectual force behind the triumph of global capitalism, an 'anti-Marx' who elucidated the theoretical foundations of the free market economy. His account of the role played by market prices in transmitting economic knowledge constituted a devastating critique of the socialist ideal of central economic planning, and his famous book The Road to Serfdom was a prophetic statement of the dangers which socialism posed to a free and open society. 

Hayek noted that complex social systems arise organically from the interactions of individuals rather than through design. He drew inspiration from Adam Smith's "invisible hand" idea that markets coordinate actions without a central plan. Anthropologists also have noted this principal when studying complex social structures.

Hayek's book The Road to Serfdom, published in 1944, warned against the dangers of collectivism and argued that centralized economic control could lead to totalitarianism.

Hayek also made significant contributions to fields as diverse as the philosophy of law, the theory of complex systems, and cognitive science. 

The essays in this volume, by an international team of contributors, provide a critical introduction to all aspects of Hayek's thought.



Wednesday, June 18, 2025

Bible Literalists and the Controversy over Evolution

 



Selling literature at the 1925 trial of John Scopes in Dayton, Tennessee.


Dr. Alice C. Linsley

The world renown paleoanthropologist and human genome researcher, John Hawks has written a fascinating article about How evolution became a uniquely American controversy

I recommend it!

Related reading: How attacks on evolution in classrooms have shifted over the last 100 yearsFacts About Evolution

Thursday, May 22, 2025

5 Philosophers of Islamic Heritage

 

Avicenna 


In the medieval period, several Islamic philosophers developed ideas that became incredibly influential, both during their lifetime and in subsequent centuries. The article below considers the following philosophers:


Al-Kindi (c. 801-73)

Al-Farabi (872-950)

Avicenna (980-1037)

Al-Ghazali (1058-1111)

Averroes (1126-1198)

Marnie Binder explains: "Despite the important contributions of the figures in this list, the reputation of Islamic philosophy was primarily defined by the work of al-Ghazali. Still, much of the work among the philosophers of Europe during the Middle Ages was significantly impacted by the world of these philosophers of the Islamic world, such as through their translations of important ancient Greek texts into Arabic and eventually into Latin. Commentaries on Aristotle—as noted, considered the “First Teacher” and ultimate source of philosophy—such as those by Averroes especially, would prove to be critical in continuing the long conversation that is the history of philosophy. All of these thinkers made important contributions that subsequently shaped the history of philosophy, of which this article only scratches the surface." (Read more here: 5 Significant Islamic Philosophers of the Middle Ages | TheCollector)

Tuesday, April 15, 2025

UK Prisoners Learn the Good Life from Aristotle

 





According to the Guardian, a small number of prisoners in the UK are given the opportunity to learn life skills from ancient Greek philosophers.

The teaching team, led by two classics professors from Durham University and supported by the prison education charity Novus, has so far completed courses in two men’s prisons, where inmates are serving long life-sentences -including life- for offences including serious violence and drugs to murder.

“Our course is designed to help prison learners use ancient philosophical wisdom to inform contemporary life,” Arlene Holmes-Henderson, a professor of classics education and public policy at Durham University told the Guardian.

Aristotle and his work on ethics and rhetoric are the main focus of the classical education in UK prisons. Prisoners seeking a new start in life can learn about communication, happiness, friendship, decision-making, and recreation. The topics are selected to provide them with that can help them achieve better lives in prison and when they are released.

The inmates appear to be thrilled to learn about classical philosophy. They wonder "Why didn’t we get this at school?"




Wednesday, February 12, 2025

World Religionists: 20th Century Limitations



Dr. Alice C. Linsley

I hope that readers have found the posts on Joseph Campbell, Raimon Panikkar, Carlos Castaneda, and Mircea Eliade helpful. I appreciate the contributions of these men, as far as they go. I wish they had pursued the antecedents of the religions that emerged in the Axial Age (c.1000 BCE - 200 CE). Antecedents provide the context and background information needed to better understand the origin, development, and causes that shaped the religious beliefs of populations of the ancient world. 

When these men were writing, much of the data about the more archaic religions was not readily available. Today we do not have that excuse. We live in a world where information is more easily available and accessed. 

Strangely, none of these men investigated the religion of Abraham's Hebrew ancestors and their influence on the ancient world (4000-2000 BCE). The religion of the early Hebrew priests predates Hinduism by at least 3000 years and predates Judaism by 3500 years. This exposes as a lie the notion that shamans represent an earlier stage of religious history than priests.

My research into the beliefs and social structure of the early Horite and Sethite Hebrew began only three years before Campbell died in 1987. Also, R. O. Faulkner's English translation of the Pyramid Texts, a valuable source of information about the Nilotic Hebrew, appeared in 1969. 

Panikkar's work would have been more helpful if he had traced the roots of Hinduism to the early Hebrew ruler-priest caste that moved out of Africa and established trade with the people of the Indus River Valley as early as 3000 BCE. The widely dispersed Hebrew caste spread elements of their belief in God Father and God Son wherever they settled in the service of high kings. They expected a universal ruler to overcome death. The idea of a universal king who is divinely appointed to rule is found in the oldest layers of Hindu thought. The Sanskrit word cakravartin and the Pali word cakkavattin refer to a righteous king who rules over the entire world. His "messianic" rule is called sar-vabhauma

From Africa to Nepal the words sar and sarki refer to rulers and priests. This is the root of the royal title Sar-gon, which means High King or King of Kings. Nimrod's Akkadian name was Šarru-kīnu, which is usually translated “the true king.” These words are related to the Akkadian words šarratum - queen, šarri - divine, and šarrum - king.

Beside the fact that much of what Castaneda wrote was fiction, his obsession with shamanic religion kept him from the intellectual understanding of that phenomena within the wider context of archaic religion. Shamans were only one religious office. The other religious office was the priest. Both shamans and priests serve as intermediaries between their communities and the supernatural. They share some common symbols such as the Tree of Life, serpent symbolism, and the Sun as the emblem of the High God. However, they represent different worldviews, different ways of reasoning, and different practices.

Underlying shamanism is the belief that there are powerful spirits who cause imbalance and disharmony in the world. The shaman’s role is to determine which spirits are at work, to find ways to appease the spirits, and to restore balance or harmony. This often involves use of psychoactive substances to induce a trance state. Rarely, does the shaman perform blood sacrifice. The hides used to make their drums come from animals that have been hunted for food.

Underlying the priesthood is belief in a supreme High God to whom humans must give an accounting, especially for the shedding of blood. The ancient laws and received traditions governing priestly ceremonies, sacrifices, cleansing and healing rituals clarify the role of the priest as one who offers sacrifice for the people according to sacred law.

Mircea Eliade wrote a great deal about shamans. Some of the healing practices of shamans were also done by the early Nilotic physician priests. The two offices must point to transcendent reality to be effective. Eliade observed that all things "acquire their reality, their identity, only to the extent of their participation in a transcendent reality." 

The history of religion during the lifetimes of these four men tended to focus on shamanic religions rather than on the religious traditions that have temple priests. The World Religions textbook that I used at Midway University (Kentucky) in the late 1990's made no distinction between the offices of shaman and priest. In the 1970's, the office of priest was denigrated due to sexual misconduct and ideological pressures from feminists and egalitarians. 

Though raised a Roman Catholic, Joseph Campbell's exploration of myths focused mainly on the religions that emerged in the Axial Age: Hinduism (the Upanishads), Judaism, Buddhism, Jainism, Daoism (Taoism), the Mediterranean mystery cults, Zoroastrianism, and Islam. His discussions of Nilotic myths involve the late syncretistic expressions of Egyptian imperialism. He does not explore the antecedents of the Ra-Horus-Hathor narrative among the early Hebrew at Nekhen (4200 BCE).


Conclusion

It is no longer credible to speak of Hinduism as the world earliest known religion. The religion of the early Nilotic Hebrew is much earlier. Information about them is found in the early biblical texts and in extra-biblical sources such as The Pyramid Texts (4000 BCE).

It is no longer credible to conflate the worldviews of shamans and priests. They pertain to two distinct cultural and geographical contexts. Both offices serve as mediators between their communities and the supernatural, but the differences in their ways of engagement must not be overlooked.

It is intellectually dishonest to pose the religions of the Axial Age as the original religions. The findings of archaeology and anthropology have exposed much early religious practices such as the 100,000-year practice of burial in red ocher, a symbolic blood covering

Thursday, November 21, 2024

US Students are Deprived of Philosophy






Dr. Alice C. Linsley

Before I retired, I taught Philosophy at the university and high school levels for 14 years. Some of my former students have gone on to become philosophy majors and philosophy teachers. It is gratifying that some stay in contact with me. They tell me that my approach to teaching philosophy is unique and that they wish others would employ a similar method of engaging students with the great minds of history.

I love Philosophy because it is the single discipline in which we may discuss everything. We are given permission to question everything, to test the validity of ideas, and to learn to think more deeply.

My philosophy students are asked to consider questions. What is real? How do we know? Is there objective truth? Is it possible to know the true nature of something? What can be known? What are the limits of human understanding? Does innate knowledge exist? Is it possible to understand natural phenomena solely on the basis of observation and the senses? What trajectories of thought can be traced through history?

Today is World Philosophy Day, established by UNESCO on the third Thursday of November, to remind us of the enduring value of philosophy for the development of human thought.

Philosophers think critically about questions that matter. In doing so, they serve an important role in society. They challenge us to reason well and to consider what questions ultimately matter. Unfortunately, the work of philosophers rarely filters down from the ivory towers of Academia to the schools where students most need to learn to think critically, to argue logically, and to openly discuss what matters.

Critical thinking skills are so lacking in the USA that many colleges and universities have found it necessary to require instruction in Critical Thinking. I taught such a course for several years at a women's college and apart from the tendency of the course designers to indoctrinate in political correctness, it was a helpful course. That said, probably a course in basic logic and reading comprehension would have been more beneficial to the students.

The study of Philosophy is required for graduation from most secondary schools in Europe. In France secondary students may opt to take the Bac Litteraire - the Literature Baccalaureat, which includes a strong philosophy curriculum. It is an alternative to the more science-biased versions of the Baccalaureat. Both tracks include an element of philosophy, but in the Bac Litteraire, Philosophy is king.

The study of Philosophy is popular among German students. It is taught in high schools (Gymnasia) so many who choose to study it later already have a strong foundation. According to this report in The Chronicle of Higher Education, the enrollments in Philosophy courses at Tübingen increased by nearly one-third, to 1,600, over a three-year period. The philosophy departments at Albert Ludwigs University of Freiburg and Goethe University in Frankfurt am Main, now have limits on enrollments in Philosophy classes.

Sadly, Philosophy is not taught in American public schools. When I attempted to introduce high school students to Philosophy by offering it as an elective, the principal of the public school declined the offer. He was concerned that irate parents would complain that the school was teaching atheism or Christian ideas. He could not fathom the possibility of positive engagement with ideas held by both atheists and Christians. He did allow me to offer an after-school Philosophy Club.

Undaunted, a few years later I asked to teach Philosophy at a private Christian school and found very responsive students. That school actually allowed greater leeway than the university where I taught and the public school.

Michael Shammas wrote in this essay that American society has become dysfunctional because we have forgotten how to think. He says, "Our Congress is useless, our institutions inept... Anger is everywhere; understanding is nowhere... We assail our political enemies with intractable opinions and self-righteous anger. An ugly bitterness pervades everything. Meanwhile, our country is slowly but surely committing suicide.

It seems to me that this dysfunctional political dialogue, which stems from the iron certainty we grant our opinions, is the most pressing problem confronting 21st century America. In fact, it is a crisis. For without the ability to carry on a useful dialogue, we cannot solve our greatest challenges, or even our smallest ones.

This raises the question: How can we solve this crisis? Because the capacity to debate requires the capacity to think, I believe the answer lies in philosophy.

Why philosophy? Because the study of philosophy, the “love of wisdom,” creates and nurtures thoughtful minds, minds that can — as Aristotle suggests — entertain a thought without accepting it."

Monday, October 21, 2024

I Love the Work of Miguel de Unamuno y Jugo

 

Miguel de Unamuno y Jugo (1864-1936)

Dr. Alice C. Linsley


I lived in Spain during my High School years, and I majored in Spanish in college. I taught Spanish and also Philosophy at the High School and University levels. My final college paper to fulfill a requirement was on Don Miguel de Unamuno y Jugo. I found his books and his ideas fascinating because they are so Spanish. Unlike the theological and philosophical works of the Northern Europeans, they are not "systematic." They often are poetic, and they ring with sincere apologies for the tragic sense of life. Yet they retain hope, even as Quijote's hope for triumph over his foes never left him. Quijote's dying words to Sancho Panza were "Bring me my sword." 

Because Unamuno's thought leaves wiggle room to explore, his disciples are free to wander down unexplored paths and to discover philosophically unfamiliar places. We are allowed to live with uncomfortable contradictions. This space is shrinking in our polarized world. Our time is not unlike the eve of the Spanish Civil War (1936-1939).

Miguel de Unamuno y Jugo was a Spanish essayist, novelist, poet, playwright, philosopher, professor of Greek and Classics, and later rector at the University of Salamanca. In October 1936 he denounced General Francisco Franco’s Falangists, was removed as rector, and was placed under house arrest. He died of a heart attack two months later.


A Man in search of Truth 

For Unamuno truth is not easily found and often presents itself as paradox. His search for truth often pitted him against the clericalism of the Spanish Church. That clericalism took on fascist features once Franco took control. 

The Catholic hierarchs of Spain denounced Unamuno as a heretic and banned his books. Bishop Gonzalez Caminero falsely claimed that "Unamuno perversely denies almost all of the fundamental dogmas of the Catholic religion." 

Bishop Pildain of the Canary Islands called Unamuno "Hereje Maximo" in a widely circulated pastoral letter. His Excellency, the Most Reverend Sr. D. Antonion De Pildain y Zapiain, declared Unamuno the "greatest heretic and teacher of heresies."

By 1936, Unamuno, one of Spain's greatest modern thinkers, was slandered and banished from public life. That was the year the Spanish Civil War began, and the Spanish Church supported Franco against the Republican Government.

Unamuno's work is difficult to label. There are traces of existentialism of a Spanish flavor, and some elements of irrationalism. It is more precise to say that he searched for answers to existential questions, and abandoned rationalism to embrace the mysteries of Faith. 

Perhaps he is best classified as a Christian Realist. He knew life was full of difficulties and inexplicable turnings. Yet he believed that there is a path that leads to God. "The road that leads us to the living God, the God of the heart, and that leads us back to Him when we have left Him for the lifeless God of logic is the road of faith." (The Tragic Sense of Life, Dover Publications, p. 186.)

In her excellent biography of Unamuno. Margaret Rudd writes about his final resting place in the Campo de San Francisco. "His crypt is in the wall to the left of the entrance; it bears the number 340, his number, and on it, beneath the crypt of Salome are inscribed Don Miguel's own words: "

Hide me, Father eternal, in your breast, 

mysterious abode, 

I shall sleep there, undone, I shall rest 

from the toils of the road."


A Man of Humor

Miguel de Unamuno had a sense of humor. Johnstone G. Patrick writes, "Years before his exile, Salvador de Madariaga tells us, when King Alfonso was still a constitutional monarch, Unamuno had been granted an order reserved for rewarding intellectual merit. He was accordingly received in audience so that he could present his thanks to the King. "Sir," he began, "I am here to thank your Majesty for this order which I have fully deserved." 

The King laughed outright. "How wonderful! They all come here telling me, 'Sir, I do not deserve it' "


A Man of Faith

Unamuno was well steeped in the Bible and his appreciation of biblical poetry as both sacred text and good literature is evident in what his writings. In his essay "Solitude" he expressed this appreciation claiming that the greatest among men is a lyric poet, "that is to say a real poet." A poet is a man who keeps "no secrets from God in his heart, and who, in singing his griefs, his fears, his hopes and his memories, purifies and purges them from all falsehood." 


Related reading: The Message of Don Miguel de Unamuno y Jugo by Johnstone G. Patrick; Margaret Rudd, Lone Heretic; The White Terror in Spain


Friday, May 17, 2024

Ethics in the Renaissance


Dr. Alice C. Linsley

Timeline

Giotto’s great works 1266–1337 AD
Pico della Mirandola 1463–1494 AD
Niccoló Machiavelli 1469–1527 AD
Michelangelo 1475–1564 AD
Columbus’ first voyage 1492–1493 AD
Emperor Charles V 1500–1558 AD
John Calvin 1509–1564 AD
Jesuit Order founded 1540 AD
Period of Religious Wars 1560–1598 AD
Christopher Marlowe 1564–1593 AD
Spanish Armada defeated 1588 AD


"It must be grasped that the Renaissance was primarily a human event, propelled forward by a number of individuals of outstanding talent, which in some cases amounted to genius. ...The Renaissance was about the work of individuals, and in a sense it was about individualism."--Paul Johnson

"I am aware that a philosopher’s ideas are not subject to the judgment of ordinary persons, because it is his endeavor to seek the truth in all things, to the extent permitted to human reason by God."--Nicolaus Copernicus (1473–1543)

    
The Renaissance was a cultural movement beginning in the 14th century in Italy. It spread to the rest of Europe, reaching England by the 16th century and northern Europe by the mid-17th century. The predominant social, intellectual and literary currents of the period emphasized appreciation of beauty, interest in classical pagan art and architecture, and the value of individual expression.




The Renaissance was driven by talented individuals who were ever seeking greater achievements. It involved renewed interest in pagan and Christian themes in literature and art. The two traditions often were shown in the same painting and depicted as sharing similar values or contrasting values. Titian’s portrayal of Sacred and Profane Love is an example (shown above). It shows two women: one dressed and holding a branch of myrtle, and the other naked and holding an oil lamp. Between them, Cupid stirs the waters. An obelisk and a church are seen in the town in the background. Hunters and hunting dogs are seen in the field behind the women. Two bodies of water separate the town from the field.

The artist who marks the transition to Renaissance painting is Giotto di Bondone, described by the 16th century biographer Vasari, as initiating “the great art of painting as we know it today, introducing the technique of drawing accurately from life, which had been neglected for more than two hundred years.”

Many of Giotto’s works were painted on wood panels in the style of icons. These were commissioned for use in the great churches of Italy. A Giotto triptych was found as recently at 2012. (See this video.)

Imagine living as an artist in Italy during the early 16th century (High Renaissance). How would you distinguish yourself from the other artists living in your area: Michelangelo, Raphael, Leonardo, or Titian? The competition was steep!

The artists of the Renaissance excelled in many medium. In the early Renaissance paintings were done on wood panels using tempura paint, an egg-based paint. From about 1550, paintings were done on canvas with oil paint. Some of the greatest Renaissance artists did fresco painting on walls and ceilings. Many also excelled at sculpture. Michelangelo Buonarroti is an example. Michelangelo completed most of his famous sculptures by age 30, but he continued to work until age 88.

Leonardo da Vinci (1452-1519) excelled at drawing and his drawings reveal his genius and remarkable imagination. His private sketch books contain drawings of helicopters, gliders, a machine gun (“3-barrelled organ”), an armored tank, and many machines. Some of the machines he drew have been built and found to work very well. Da Vinci also researched the human body to ensure his artworks were anatomically accurate. Between 1507 and 1513 he dissected more than 30 human corpses. Today Da Vinci’s drawings of the human body are regarded as masterpieces both as works of art and as studies of the human anatomy.

There was as much competition and individual drive in literature and drama as in art. Christopher Marlowe’s work embodied the Humanism of Erasmus. Erasmus lived in England between 1505 and 1517 and he was influential in fostering sympathy for Henry VIII’s political aspirations. Erasmus’ views aligned well with Henry’s desire to centralize political and religious power in the person of the King and to require obedience to a unified church and state in England. Marlowe questioned religious authority, much as Erasmus questioned the corruption he saw among Roman Catholic prelates during his time in Rome. Marlowe’s plays were as famous in his day as those of Shakespeare, one of his contemporaries.

William Shakespeare and Christopher Marlowe were trained in classical literature and were writing for the stage between 1587 and 1593. Marlowe died in 1593. Prior to 1587, there were no educated men dedicated to the public theater as professional writers. However, in England by the time Marlowe and Shakespeare had gained public recognition, there were eight other men competing for work as dramatists, and their ambition drove them to ever greater individual accomplishments.


A Time Like Our Own

In many ways the Renaissance was a time like our own. It was marked by individualism, renewed interest in paganism, religious conflict, Islamic expansion, deadly diseases, and new directions in literature, art, healthcare and education. The accomplishments of the Renaissance must be viewed against the backdrop of bloody religious conflict, the plague, the territorial ambitions of the Ottoman Turks in the Mediterranean, and the discovery of the New World which expanded geographical horizons and stimulated European imaginations and economies. The Renaissance was a period marked by the quest for discovery in virtually every area of human endeavor.

The invention of the printing press made it possible for scholars to share their research and for literate nobles and merchants to enjoy the great literature of their day. The impact was much like the impact of the internet today. The difference is that many people during the Renaissance were not able to read. It was not an egalitarian society in which equality was a value, and it was not a democratic society. Enacting laws and enforcing laws was the work of the landed nobles and their king.

In our time we face religious upheaval and renewed interest in pagan ideas and religions. We live with terrible diseases such as COVID, Ebola and HIV/AIDS, and the resurgence of resistant strains of old diseases such a Tuberculosis and Polio. Healthcare reform is a topic of concern to many. In education, parents seek alternatives to public education, such as charter schools, parochial schools, home schooling, and classical education schools.

Islamic leaders call for expansion of Islam, aspiring to establish an Islamic world empire under Sharia Law. This has led to the outlawing of Sharia in some places. Some extremists propose holy war (jihad) against any who oppose them.

As there are no new lands to discover, we look instead to the heavens, as did Galileo. We have technologies that DaVinci would have loved and probably imagined: Space X, Starlink, space satellites, etc. It is hoped that cooperative space exploration will lead to the discovery of earth-like planets in other galaxies. This hope stirs the human imagination and nurtures technological development.


Ethical Considerations of the Renaissance

This lesson concentrates on the 15th and 16th centuries because it was during these centuries that the key ethical questions of the Renaissance came most clearly into focus. The ethical questions of the Renaissance that will be addressed in this lesson are:

  • The dignity of Man
  • Responsibility of the nobility
  • Reform of education and healthcare
  • The power of rulers and the authority of the Papacy
  • Religious intolerance, persecution and war
  • Individual conscience and personal interpretation

The question of human nature was addressed by both Roman Catholicism and Lutheranism. The Catholic position held that while humans are sinful due to the fall of Man, the image of God with which we were originally created is not fully erased. Therefore Man has dignity derived from being made in the “image and likeness of God.” The Reformers Martin Luther and John Calvin did not deny that humans were created in God’s image, but they believed that that the fall so thoroughly corrupted us that we were robbed of our original dignity. Our sinfulness is such that we no longer are free to desire communion with God. Our wills are in bondage to sin and we stand before the Creator as filthy beggars.

During the Renaissance, Luther’s view was challenged by the Christian Humanist Erasmus and by others who believed that the Lutheran doctrine of total depravity robs humanity of the dignity that remains even after the Fall. That dignity comes from the image of God that cannot be completely erased from human nature.

Humanism took various expressions in the Renaissance. Some humanists, such as Erasmus, were deeply religious. These stressed the dignity of man and both heavenly and earthly rewards. Others were scoffers of religion who sought all possible rewards in this life. This secular humanism was a reaction against Church authority and also against the bloodshed that resulted from religious conflict.

Renaissance Humanism shifted the focus from God to Man and from the supernatural to the natural. Human achievement and creative potential took center stage. Some Renaissance thinkers believed that humans have the potential to become almost divine through the use of reason (Pico della Mirandola). Others believed that humans could achieve dignity only by casting off the social and religious conventions of their time (Christopher Marlowe). The development of the printing press made it possible for all to share their ideas with a wider audience than had ever been imagined.

The debate over the dignity of man was fed by both scientific discovery and humanistic literature. Copernicus proved that the sun was at the center of the planetary system, rather than earth, radically altering the worldview of many learned people. This was significant because earth and humanity could no longer be regarded as the center of the universe.

The Italian philosopher Giovanni Pico della Mirandola, in a work titled “Oration on the Dignity of Man” exalted humanity as being capable of rising to the level of angels through philosophy and reason. He pictured humans between beasts and angels and insisted that by allowing reason to rule our emotions, we ascend to the level of angels. By acting against reason, we descend to the level of beasts. He asserted that only human beings could change themselves since humans alone have free will. His Oration on the Dignity of Man is considered the Manifesto of the Renaissance.

Christopher Marlowe’s play Doctor Faustus typifies the spirit of humanism in the character of Faustus who aspires to superhuman powers by making a pact with the devil. Faustus is fascinated by the prospect of pushing beyond the religious conventions of his time. At the same time, he fears the possible consequences. The character Faustus embodies both the boldness and the anxiety of Renaissance individualism.

Faustus represents Marlowe’s exploration of his own psyche. He scoffed at the major religions and said, “I count religion but a childish toy.” He also mocked the intelligence of religious people. The character of Faustus makes a declaration about the dignity of man that is very Nietzschean, that is to say: a man can achieve any earthly power he might desire, but to do so, he must utterly reject social and religious conventions.

Doctor Faustus was performed twenty-five times between October 1594 and October 1597 and was one of the most popular plays of Renaissance England. The troupe that performed Marlowe’s play was called The Admiral’s Men because they were supported financially by their patron Charles Howard, 1st Earl of Nottingham, who commanded a squadron of ships.

Patronage of the arts developed in the Middle Ages but reached its peak during the Renaissance. Nobles vied with the Church for the services of the best artists, poets and philosophers. Wealthy families provided housing, food and a stipend in exchange for an artist’s work. Renaissance patronage made it possible for people like Giotto, Titan, and Michelangelo to dedicate themselves to their work, but it was not without problems, as we will discover when we explore the ethics of patronage.


The Responsibility of Kings and Nobles

During the Renaissance the ideal nobleman was a literate and refined gentleman of courtly manners. He had responsibility for the care of servants, peasants and family members, which for noblemen of limited resources posed a financial challenge. Some noble families lost their estates or became vassals of more wealthy lords in order to be able to keep their estates. This meant swearing loyalty to the overlord and coming to his aid in time of war.

Many nobles sought to be patrons of great artists in order to gain social status. During the Middle Ages the Church had been the primary patron of the arts, but during the Renaissance new systems of patronage developed. Artists were supported by individuals, noble families, organizations, and cities. The patron who commissioned work from an artist was to provide his material needs until that work was finished. The Florentine wool guild, for example, commissioned religious paintings and sculptures for the adornment of the Cathedral in Florence.

The Renaissance saw greater centralization of power among wealthy rulers, sometimes called “new monarchs.” These were men who were able to command armies to police their territories and to expand their territories. After a period of famine, plague and self-serving medieval chivalry, the new monarchs stirred Europe out of decline by forming new allegiances. Renaissance diplomacy became an art form and there was much political intrigue. Powerful new weapons were employed in war. Power struggles and shifting alliances between kings resulted in the destruction of property and citizens. This was evident on Italian soil where the German Hapsburg kings and the French Valois kings engaged in prolonged wars that devastated Italy.

Religion played a role in government. Kings often sought the support of bishops to justify their political actions. Henry VIII declared that the Pope no longer had authority in the realm of England. In Geneva, Calvin’s teachings ruled the day and his Consistory controlled all aspects of civil and religious life.

The Consistory was a council of pastors and elders elected to represent the 13 districts (cantons). The Consistory maintained church discipline, dictated standards of moral behavior, and established laws. Calvin has been accused of using the Consistory to advance his political aims and to punish those who challenged his authority. Some of his opponents were tortured and beheaded, and those accused of witchcraft were hunted and burned to death. In 1545, the Consistory charged 23 people with practicing witchcraft and they were burned at the stake in Geneva. Calvin's acceptance of torture was not unusual among rulers of that time.


Machiavellian Ethics

By far the most significant political philosopher of the Renaissance was Niccólo Machiavelli whose writings on statesmanship have brought him both notoriety and fame.

Machiavelli took a pragmatic approach to government. He believed that the first responsibility of the ruler is to increase and maintain his power and that the ruler was justified to use any means to accomplish this. Machiavelli studied the political tactics of some of Italy’s most cunning rulers, particularly those of Cesare Borgia, who through military prowess was enlarging his holdings in central Italy. (Borgia was the illegitimate son of Pope Alexander VI.)

Machiavelli believed that bold and intelligent initiative on the part of a ruler could shape his fortune. In his view, human dignity was gained by exercise of the will to rule. Machiavelli provides instructions to the “new prince” on how to stabilize his power and retain control of his realm in his book “The Prince.” The prince is to appear benevolent in public while secretly acting as ruthlessly as necessary to squash his political opponents. He argues that this will achieve the greater good by maintaining social stability.

Machiavelli established guidelines for the ruler’s actions. He proposed this definition of acceptable cruelty: Whatever is done to one’s enemy must be swift, effective and short-lived, and there must not be collateral damage. In other words, killing a political opponent should be done as painlessly as possible, secretly, and without affecting other people or their property. Machiavelli justified this by reasoning that the ruler who has power can use it to benefit his subjects. The more powerful the ruler is, the greater his subjects’ benefits.

Machiavelli considered that some places, such as Milan, would never be ruled properly because there were too many nobles competing for power. His solution was to exterminate them all. He wrote, “In order to create a Republic in Milan it would be necessary to exterminate all the nobility. . . . For there are, among the nobles, so many exalted personages that the laws do not suffice to repress them, and they must needs be kept under by a living voice and a royal power.” (Discourse on the reform of the State of Firenze).

Machiavelli’s political ethics depart from those of Socrates, Plato and Aristotle. This is because Machiavelli saw that whatever a ruler does there are likely to be both good and bad consequences. In “The Discourses” (1517), he wrote, “It seems that in all the actions of men, besides the general difficulties of carrying them to a successful issue, the good is accompanied by some special evil, and so closely allied to it that it would seem impossible to achieve the one without encountering the other.”

Socrates would have argued that unless an action serves the common good of all citizens, the ruler should not do it. Plato would have said that a ruler who does evil is someone who does not have an intimate acquaintance with eternal Goodness. Aristotle argued that there are some actions which are always bad and should never be done.

Consider the different viewpoints expressed in the writings of Machiavelli and Aristotle:

Machiavelli wrote that it is not necessary for a prince to have the qualities of honestly, kindness, loyalty, etc, “but it is necessary to seem to have them…useful it is to seem compassionate, trustworthy, humane, endowed with integrity, religious, and to be such, but to be in such a condition, with one’s spirit so constructed, that, when you need to not possess these qualities, you are prepared and know how to shift to the contrary qualities… Let, then, a prince act in such a manner as to conquer and maintain his estate, and the means will always be judged honorable, and they will be praised by everyone – since the crowd is always going to be taken in by appearances and results, and in the world there is no one but the crowd…”

Aristotle wrote: “There are some actions and emotions whose very names connote baseness, e.g., spite, shamelessness, envy; and among actions, adultery, theft, and murder. These and similar emotions and actions imply by their very names that they are bad... It is, therefore, impossible ever to do right in performing them: to perform them is always wrong.”


Reform of Education and Healthcare

Around the time that Machiavelli was gaining recognition in Italy, Ignatius of Loyola was born in Spain (1491). He was to have a worldwide influence as the founder of the Jesuits, a Catholic religious order that quickly spread over the globe.

The first Jesuits were ordained to the priesthood in Venice and offered themselves in service to Pope Paul III, who gave official approval to the Order in 1540. Ignatius served as General Superior of the Jesuits until his death at the age of 65. During his lifetime Jesuit missionaries went to China, Africa, Mexico and South America. Jesuit priests founded several towns in Brazil, including São Paulo and Rio de Janeiro.

The Society of Jesus dedicated itself to education. The first Jesuit schools adopted the curriculum of the Renaissance humanist academies which included the study of Greek, Latin poetry, oratory, drama, mathematics, theology and history. When Ignatius' died in 1556, the Jesuits were operating 74 colleges on three continents, and by 1626 the order had established 400 colleges throughout Europe. Jesuits colleges and universities became the standard for excellence and produced some of the greatest minds of European history, among them: Copernicus, Galileo, Miguel de Cervantes, Otto Brufels (the “father” of botany), and the brilliant mathematician and philosopher René Descartes, to name a few.

The Catholic Church funded schools and charity work to the poor through its parishes and religious orders throughout Europe. Priests, nuns and lay clerics staffed schools and hospitals, but where Protestantism became the established religion, such as in northern Germany, Catholic educational and charitable efforts were taken over by Protestants.

Most of the hospitals in Europe were founded by Catholic orders of nuns and monks. The Ospedale Maggiore in Milan housed one of the first community hospitals, the largest such undertaking of the 15th century. In the 14th century, the Alexian Brothers in Germany and the Netherlands organized care for victims of the Black Plague and established institutions for people with contagious diseases such as leprosy. Nuns and monks provided most of the nursing care and even made important discoveries in the field.

During the Renaissance, universities in Italy, Spain and Germany became centers for the education of medical practitioners. Success in the cure of diseases encouraged further investigation of medicinal herbs, and autopsies of the dead helped doctors learn more about the human body.


Religious Intolerance

The Renaissance was a time of religious intolerance and bloody religious conflict. Catholic and Protestant rulers made war against each other. Catholics and Protestants killed each other and both fought the Ottoman Turks.

Under Luther’s influence northern German became Lutheran and the Catholics living there faced religious persecution. To escape trouble, many moved to southern Germany which remained Catholic. The 1555 Peace of Augsburg was a treaty between the catholic Emperor Ferdinand and the Lutheran princes. It was intended to lessen religious strife in Europe, but it actually made matters worse. The Peace of Augsburg caused thousands of Calvinists to flee from Germany to the Spanish Netherlands where they stirred resistance to Spain’s control of the Netherlands. The king of Spain was determined to squash the Calvinist resistance to his authority in the Netherlands and there were many years of bloody battles. Other Calvinists left Germany for France where they encountered intolerance from the mainly Catholic population. Still others went to Geneva or to England where they were more welcome.

When Charles V gave up his throne, his son, Philip II, inherited Spain, the Netherlands, most of Italy, and Spain's colonies in the New World. Philip’s troops viciously attacked Protestant protesters in Holland and Belgium. Determined to uproot Protestantism from the Netherlands, Philip brought in Inquisitors and increased the number of Catholic bishops from four to sixteen. The Protestant rebellion against Spain dragged on until 1648 and become part of the wider European conflict known as the “Thirty Years War.”

In 1566, the Duke of Alva with an army of 10,000 Spanish troops burned Calvinist churches, executed their leaders, and nearly extinguished the Calvinist resistance in the Netherlands. However, Calvinist sea raiders gained control of some ports in the north. When word spread of these Calvinist safe ports, more Calvinists flocked Holland. As a result of this migration, most people living in northern Holland today are Protestant.

Tensions between Calvinists and Catholics in France triggered anarchy and weakened the government. The Catholic majority opposed an influential minority of French Calvinists known as “Huguenots.” The Huguenots had the advantage of living primarily in the fortified southern cities ruled by nobles who provided excellent leadership. Catholic and Huguenot armies battled in France for almost 30 years, destroying fields, homes and lives. Seven religious wars were fought in France and the fighting often involved the massacre of women and children. From 1562-157l there were 5 massacres of Catholics and 18 massacres of Protestants, the most notorious being the Saint Bartholomew's Day Massacre (1572), when armed Catholics in Paris fell upon local and visiting Calvinists, killing 3000.

Spain used the unrest in France to intervene in France’s internal affairs. Tensions between Protestant England and Catholic Spain led the English to raid Spanish shipping and support the revolt in the Spanish Netherlands. Meanwhile Philip II conspired to dethrone Elizabeth I. The eclipse of Spain’s military and naval power came in 1588 when the English defeated the Spanish Armada.


Conscience and Individual Interpretation

The idea that one should act according to the dictates of one’s conscience emerged among the ancient Greeks. The conscience as a moral guide was one of the teachings at a famous philosophical academy in Tarsus in Turkey. This was the hometown of the Apostle Paul. The Tarsus academy was founded by the Stoic philosopher Athenodorus before Paul was born. The Greek geographer Strabo considered the Tarsus academy to be better than the academies of Athens and Alexandria, Egypt. Athenodorus taught that, “Every man's conscience is his god.” It is likely that Paul heard a great deal about the conscience while growing up in Tarsus because Paul makes abundant use of the Greek word for conscience in his New Testament writings (Romans 2:15; 1 Corinthians 8:7-12; 1 Timothy 1:5-19; Romans 9:1).

In the Renaissance, the individual conscience again emerged as a moral guide, but many thinkers hesitated to speak from their consciences for fear of persecution or charges of heresy. Such was the case with Galileo who had a strong interest in Copernican theory. In 1543, Copernicus published “Revolutions of the Celestial Orbs” in which he set forth his idea that the Sun was at the center of the universe and that the rotating Earth complete one full orbit around the Sun every 365 days. After much study, Galileo concluded that Copernicus was right. He admitted this in a 1597 letter to Johannes Kepler, who had also written about planetary systems. Galileo wrote, “Like you, I accepted the Copernican position several years ago and discovered from thence the cause of many natural effects which are doubtless inexplicable by the current theories.”

Galileo’s conscience led him to pursue the truth, but he was wise enough to keep his thoughts to himself until he had conclusively confirmed Copernicus’ calculations using a telescope. Galileo explained to Kepler: “I have not dared until now to bring my reasons and refutations into the open, being warned by the fortunes of Copernicus himself, our master, who procured for himself immortal fame among a few but stepped down among the great crowd.”

The Protestant movement broke with Church Tradition when it came to interpretation of the Bible. Among Catholics, Bible interpretation was done by Bible scholars; people who could read the texts in the original Hebrew, Aramaic and Greek. Protestants developed a different approach to Bible interpretation based on conscience and personal interpretation of the Bible, apart from the Tradition of the Church and the Church Fathers. The printing of Bibles in languages other than Latin made it possible for people to read the Bible in their own languages.

Historically, the Catholic Church valued individual conscience as a God-given gift that could lead the individual to virtue. However, challenges to the Catholic Church’s authority made the matter of individual conscience less important than unquestioning obedience to the Church’s teachings.

As Protestants rejected the Vatican’s teaching authority, they asserted for themselves new authorities: the individual conscience, personal interpretation of the Bible, and the importance of reason.

Baron Samuel Pufendorf, a German rationalist, concluded that the individual reason is capable of deciding between right and wrong, and between truth and falsehood. The Protestant movement leaned heavily on this rationalist idea. Coupled with Renaissance humanism and rationalism, Protestant thought prepared the way for modern ethics based on human reason, individual conscience, and personal experience.


Summary

During the Renaissance, rulers provided for artists and musicians who offered their services to their wealthy patrons. The more artists one could support, the more social status one had. The system of patronage expanded to include noble families, organizations and cities. The competition between artists to draw the attention of patrons drove them to ever greater personal accomplishments.

Many of the famous artists of the Renaissance were gifted in drawing, painting and sculpture. Some, like Leonardo da Vinci, were also visionaries who drew images of future inventions. Some excelled in math and the sciences, as well as in art. This multi-talented figure stands behind the phrase “a Renaissance man.”

During the Renaissance, there was a renewed interest in pagan themes in literature and art. Pagans themes were often portrayed alongside Christian themes. Often the two traditions were depicted as sharing similar values or contrasting values. Titan’s portrayal of Sacred and Profane Love is an example.

Competition was steep in literature and drama also. In the Golden Age of English drama there were ten famous playwrights competing for patrons.

Kings, bishops and nobles provided for artists and also took responsibility for family, servants and serfs who lived on their lands. They maintained armies and conducted diplomatic missions. They also defended the faith of their regions; Catholicism in Spain and Spanish holdings; Lutheranism in Northern Germany, and Calvinism in Switzerland.

Machiavelli believed that the ruler was to appear to be just and generous while dealing ruthlessly with his political opponents in secret. He justified his political ethics by reasoning that the ruler uses his power to benefit his subjects. The more powerful the ruler is, the greater his subjects’ benefits.

The humanism of the Renaissance stressed the dignity of man and the possibility of earthly rewards through individual accomplishments. Some humanists expressed the dignity of man in religious terms, stressing the image of God as an indelible mark. Pico della Mirandola believed that human dignity came with reason whereby humans can rise to the level of angels.

The Jesuits established universities throughout Europe and Catholic orders of nuns and monks founded many hospitals. Nuns and monks provided the nursing care and made important discoveries in the field of health care. Universities in Italy, Spain and Germany trained medical practitioners. Dissections were used to teach human anatomy.

Protestantism greatly influenced ethics during the Renaissance. Protestants developed ethical methods based on the principles of individual conscience and individual interpretation of the Bible, apart from the “Tradition” of the Church. Historically, Catholicism valued individual conscience as a God-given gift that can lead the individual to virtue. However, while the Catholic Church felt under siege from Protestantism and advancing Islam, this value was surrendered to the greater concern for obedience to the Church’s teachings.

Protestant rationalism coupled with Renaissance humanism prepared the way for modern ethics, based on human reason and individual conscience. This brings us to the eve of the Enlightenment, a new period in the history of Ethics.

Related reading: Aims and Means of Early Jesuit Education; Christopher Marlowe and the Golden Age of England; The Trial of Galileo; Machiavelli Believed in Fortune